I was browsing my local firearm boutique last night and noticed a bunch of those PPK looking Sigs. I've been kind of fond of them but never held nor shot one. I know that the 230 is an earlier version of the 232, but what are the exact changes. I noticed the grips were different, but that was it. Both were .380, but the 230 was like $200 cheaper than the 232. Is the 230 worth getting over the 232?
Difference between Sig 230 and 232?
- Thread starter Daedalus
- Start date
The difference between 230 and 232 is...
2
Mike
PS Seriously? Not much of a difference that I'm aware of. The SigGrips on the 232 are nicer, but you can buy aftermarket Hogues (same thing) and install them yourself on the 230 for way less than $200. One of the two you saw might have night sights and the other may not, check and see.
2
Mike
PS Seriously? Not much of a difference that I'm aware of. The SigGrips on the 232 are nicer, but you can buy aftermarket Hogues (same thing) and install them yourself on the 230 for way less than $200. One of the two you saw might have night sights and the other may not, check and see.
They are essentially the same but the 232 is $200 more? Wow, it must be the stainless version. if so, it is worth its weight literally. blowbacks are kinda harsh on the recoil. Maybe it is just the stainless top and alum lower. Both are nice. It's better than any ppk product(JMHO). The finish is super nice. You know they make one in .32acp. That might be a nice alt since that round is real mild even out of my p32 keltec. It's super accurate to since my p32 has no real sites to speak of. The all stainless one is the one to get if you want a smooth shooter. Get the all black(alum lower) one for carry...Can't go wrong with Sig! I have too many, or so my wifes says...