Did anybody see this confrontation yesterday?

MoW

Moderator
From the Tucker Carlson show on MSNBC transcript----
CARLSON: Welcome back.

Americans love a good conspiracy theory. And this one is bigger than anything Oliver Stone has ever dreamed up. Close to half this country in a recent poll said they believe President Bush is personally manipulating gasoline prices to help Republican candidates in this November‘s midterm elections. Not surprisingly, two-thirds of those who buy into the conspiracy theory are registered Democrats.

My next guest appears to be one of them.

Joining us now from Louisville, Kentucky, state representative Colonel Mike Weaver, who is currently running for Congress.

Colonel Weaver, thanks for joining us.

STATE REP. COL. MIKE WEAVER, KENTUCKY: Well, thanks for inviting me, Tucker.

CARLSON: Now, how exactly could the president of the United States, this or any other, control the international petroleum markets? How is Bush pulling this off?

WEAVER: Well, you just made the assumption that I‘m one of them.

CARLSON: OK.

WEAVER: I am not one of them. I do not believe that the president of the United States, nor anybody in his administration, can control that. I don‘t think they can control the price of gasoline at the pump.

CARLSON: You...

WEAVER: What I do think this administration has done is they have an energy policy that favors big energy, big oil and gas, and they have given them record profits. And because of that, record tax breaks, and because of that they have made record profits. I believe that has happened, but as far as the president...

CARLSON: OK. But you were—wait, hold on. You were quoted the other day as saying—I quoted in I believe “The Washington Post” as saying you -- to your supporters, people at one of your campaign events—that you found it very suspicious and that they ought to find it very suspicious as well the gas prices have come down in the months before the midterm elections.

Did you not say that?

WEAVER: I said that, but I don‘t mean that the president of the United States or anybody in his administration has the power to do that.

CARLSON: Well, what exactly do you mean by that? Well, what do you mean by that, then?

WEAVER: I think the issue we need to be talking about is what we are going to do about the cost of gasoline and what we are going to do about the price of energy.

CARLSON: Well, no, no, no. OK, that may be the issues. But you are playing to people‘s fears, you‘re stoking their paranoia, you‘re contributing to their belief in a conspiracy theory, are you not, when you say it‘s “suspicious”?

WEAVER: No.

CARLSON: You said it‘s suspicious. What exactly—what precisely is suspicious?

WEAVER: I think it‘s suspicious to anyone that the price of gasoline has gone down dramatically. But I don‘t think this administration had anything to do with it.

CARLSON: Well, then what‘s suspicious about it?

WEAVER: I think the big oil companies are the ones who caused the price of gasoline to go down, and I think it‘s the big oil companies that we need to bring back into control.

CARLSON: Well, how exactly...

WEAVER: But I think...

CARLSON: Whoa, whoa, whoa. Wait, slow down.

How exactly could the “big oil companies”—and by big oil companies you mean specifically which companies, A? B, how exactly did they bring the price of oil down since they don‘t control the price of oil, as I‘m sure you know.

WEAVER: They control the supply of oil, but that is—that‘s not the issue. The issue is that big oil companies are making record profits, and those record profits are being felt by working men and women, and it—everything...

CARLSON: Yes?

WEAVER: ... that they buy, everything that they do is affected by this.

CARLSON: That is—that is one of the issues. The other issue, though, is you have close to half the country believing that the president of the United States is in control of gasoline prices. That‘s what ordinary people believe, according to the latest Gallup Poll.

And you know htat, of course. And a lot of Democrats believe that.

And you are pandering to their false belief when you say things like, we ought to be suspicious of the drop in gasoline prices. And I‘m saying, as an intelligence man who‘s in a position of leadership in this country, aren‘t you negligent and irresponsible to be pandering to people‘s worst instincts and fears, as you are apparently doing?

WEAVER: I am not apparently doing that. I think we have a problem with energy in this country. I think the price of gas is too high.

I think that it is too high because we have an administration that allowed the big oil companies to have record tax breaks and then make record profits on gasoline at the pumps. And it has an adverse impact...

CARLSON: You say it‘s too high...

WEAVER: ... adverse impact, dramatic adverse impact on working men and women in this country.

CARLSON: Yes. There‘s no doubt—there‘s no doubt about that. And, in fact, on everybody in this country. I don‘t know what you mean by working men and women, whoever they are. Everyone in this country pretty much has a job. We‘re all working men and women. OK?

But I don‘t understand what you are mad about. You said gasoline prices are too high, but then you‘re complaining to your—your crowd of supporters that they are too low, it‘s suspicious how low they are. So, are they too high or are they too low? Pick one.

WEAVER: You sound very mad. I don‘t sound mad at you at all.

CARLSON: Well, I‘ll tell you why—I‘ll tell you why I‘m annoyed, is because you are going out and talking to people who are willing to believe what you say, and you are leaving a false impression. But you are doing it in a very indirect way.

You‘re saying it‘s suspicious, rather than just coming out and saying, look, the Bush administration is controlling gas prices for political reasons. If you made that statement you‘d have to defend it, but you‘re not even willing to do that. You‘re implying it, which makes it—it‘s a shifty position, if you see what I‘m saying, and it leads to people being even more suspicious of their government, which is a shame.

WEAVER: Here I am in Kentucky looking directly into a camera and you, I believe, are in California.

CARLSON: Yes.

WEAVER: And I am telling you and everybody who is watching this show that I do not believe that the president of the United States or anyone in his administration...

CARLSON: Right.

WEAVER: ... has manipulated the price of gasoline.

CARLSON: OK.

WEAVER: I do not think they have the power to do that.

CARLSON: Right. That‘s because I‘m confronting you on television and you are unwilling to imply what you implied to people in a rally with no television cameras. And that‘s why I am annoyed by it, if you see what I‘m saying. I‘m sure you do.

WEAVER: Well, I think you wanted to be annoyed at me before we ever started this. And I would just...

CARLSON: No, actually—I promise, I didn‘t.

WEAVER: I would just tell you that you knew exactly what you were going to ask me. I don‘t even remember what rally you are talking about or—certainly you weren‘t there.

CARLSON: No, I wasn‘t.

WEAVER: And so you have taken something that I said, probably taking it out of context, and confronting me with it on national television because you want to make a point that all Democrats are bad and that we are accusing the president of the United States of something that he didn‘t do.

CARLSON: Yes.

WEAVER: And I am appearing on your television show and telling you and everybody that‘s watching that the president of the United States does not have the power to do that, and I do not believe he is personal responsible for that.

CARLSON: Good. Well, I‘m glad—I‘m glad we could clear that up on this program. See, television does have a good use.

Thanks a lot for joining us. I appreciate it.

WEAVER: Well, thank you. Thank you for having me.

CARLSON: Coming up, George Allen‘s campaign is going

Shows how people running for office will say what they want people to hear to try and get elected. It should also clear up, once and for all, the theory about gas prices.:rolleyes:
 
I saw it---too funny. The guy just completely did a 180 on what he said at his political rally. He just kept trying to get his talking point across again and again. Gas prices too high, no too low, suspicious, not suspicious.
 
God. Talk about two morons.

There are, however, quite a few people at my office who believe that Bush is pushing buttons on his desk to control the price of oil.

I tried to explain the concept of a highly desired commodity that's traded on the open market.

Blank stares.
 
There are, however, quite a few people at my office who believe that Bush is pushing buttons on his desk to control the price of oil.

I tried to explain the concept of a highly desired commodity that's traded on the open market.

Blank stares.

I know what you mean----just the fact that almost 50% believe that it is possible speaks volumes about American's educations. However, even in simple terms, you would think that they could understand that nations such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela etc...would have NO interest in helping Bush even if it was true---which it isn't.:p
 
There are, however, quite a few people at my office who believe that Bush is pushing buttons on his desk to control the price of oil.

I tried to explain the concept of a highly desired commodity that's traded on the open market.

Blank stares.


LOL! I can be fairly certain that my dad, my brother, and my two best friends are all well under the belief that this is exactly what Bush is able to do and is doing.

My brother lives in MA (Nantucket, actually, not far from where Kerry has a multimillion $ home), and the other three live in L.I. NY and NYC. :rolleyes:

Surprise surprise.

I haven't asked them, but I'm sure they are more likely to believe this than to doubt it. Lately, my best friend can't shut up about the "Loose Change" 9/11 conspiracy-theory video... :barf:


-azurefly
 
Personally ... I think GW is an idiot of the first magnitude. Puppet for an agenda only.

As for manipulation of oil / gas prices .... The big oil corporations know who their allies are ... don't be fooled.

It's a historical fact that very lucrative oil fields have been closed to help manipulate oil prices. If you think your simple supply / demand / market volatility answers the question ... you're I'm sorry to say , a fool.

As a very wise man once said ... a LITTLE knowledge is a dangerous thing. You are aware of only enough to help support/sustain an agenda that reaches far beyond the price of oil.
 
It's a historical fact that very lucrative oil fields have been closed to help manipulate oil prices. If you think your simple supply / demand / market volatility answers the question

Wait a sec. If the fields were CLOSED to manipulate prices (if true), then this affects SUPPLY. Which in turn affects the supply/demand/market volatility analysis. So said analysis still holds true. It's not simple, really. Well, at it's basic level, it IS simple, but with many complicating factors. But what you just described proves the theory of supply and demand (which is a fact); it does NOT disprove it, as was your apparent intent.

Blank stares.
:D
 
petre said:
It's a historical fact that very lucrative oil fields have been closed to help manipulate oil prices.


Well, I may not know this as a fact like you say you do, but it makes sense at least on its face.

By pretending that there isn't a lot of oil available, and sitting on what is known to be rich fields, the sellers can demand a high price (supply being "low"); and they can gradually go for the big caches as the current "small" supply dries up. They are just rationing out their supply so that it can consistently be sold for high "low-supply/high-demand" prices.


But seriously... Does anyone harbor the delusion that the world was ever NOT this way, or that it will ever NOT be this way? Come on...

This stuff happens because greed is an intrinsic part of human nature -- perhaps not of every human being's nature, but enough of them to have a profound effect. And humanity is not capable of exchanging its nature for a preferable one. We are stuck with the way we are.


-azurefly
 
As for manipulation of oil / gas prices .... The big oil corporations know who their allies are ... don't be fooled.


Apparently you missed the part that states that the "big oil corporations" do NOT control the oil prices!:rolleyes: Please explain if you will why Saudi Arabia, Iran, Russia, Venezuela etc...would have ANY interest in helping Bush?!:confused:
 
I'm going to say two things, and two things only.

First off, TRUTH is stranger than fiction.

And Secondly, Stranger things have happened.

Take it as thou wilt...
 
I'm going to say two things, and two things only.

First off, TRUTH is stranger than fiction.

And Secondly, Stranger things have happened.

Take it as thou wilt...

Thus you see why 50% believe conspiracy theories---never mind the facts!:rolleyes:
 
Carlson said that oil companys don't control the price of oil.
Looks like Weaver ate his lunch!

CARLSON: Whoa, whoa, whoa. Wait, slow down.

How exactly could the “big oil companies”—and by big oil companies you mean specifically which companies, A? B, how exactly did they bring the price of oil down since they don‘t control the price of oil, as I‘m sure you know.

WEAVER: They control the supply of oil, but that is—that‘s not the issue. The issue is that big oil companies are making record profits, and those record profits are being felt by working men and women, and it—everything...

badbob
 
Carlson said that oil companys don't control the price of oil.
Looks like Weaver ate his lunch!

:confused: :confused: They DON'T control the price of oil!


Maybe I can put it in simple terms for at least some----

What you pay for gas is divided into 4 categories
1. Crude oil----59%
2. refining-----10%
3. Distribution & Marketing----11%
4. Taxes-------20%

OK so 59% goes to the crude-oil suppliers. They are also known as OPEC, which is made up of 11 countries---Algeria, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Venezuela


Do you see anybody on the list having ANY interest in helping Bush?:rolleyes: They and they ALONE determine whether gas prices are high or low by simply increasing or decreasing production.
 
Apparently you missed the part that states that the "big oil corporations" do NOT control the oil prices! Please explain if you will why Saudi Arabia, Iran, Russia, Venezuela etc...would have ANY interest in helping Bush?!

It's amazing how well propaganda works. It's like mass hypnosis that's leading the blind into a pit.

Big oil makes record profits for going on 2 years now ... but you don't think they control, or have any influence over pricing???

BTW ... I don't think that their interest is in helping Bush. The agenda is much larger than Bush whose merely a puppet.
 
but you don't think they control, or have any influence over pricing???

BTW ... I don't think that their interest is in helping Bush.

2 things---

1. Please tell me what influence they have OVER OPEC? It would be as much as an employee at McDonalds deciding what to charge for a cheeseburger!
2. If you don't think that their interest is in helping Bush-----then that KILLS the whole idea of Bush manipulating gas prices to help the GOP?!:eek:
 
"It's a historical fact that very lucrative oil fields have been closed to help manipulate oil prices."

And that's what happens in a market/supply side capitalist economy.

Hell, I believe Chrysler is doing something similar right now because market demand is soft for their products right now. They're slowing down production to reduce inventories and keep prices stable.

There's nothing wrong, per se, with that.

The concept that you're missing is that George Bush, PERSONALLY, is manipulating oil prices.

(Best George Bush voice)
"Well, you see, if I push this button here, it causes all of the oil wells in the world to slow to 50% capacity. That reduces supply dramatically, and my buddies in the oil industry get to roll around nekkid in even bigger piles of money.

"But, if I push this button here, the Dept. of Energy people will, through chips the RNC had planted in their heads, suddenly "see" skyrocketing distillate reserves, pushing the price of gas and oil lower, which is a good thing just before an election.

"If I push this button here, well, I don't know what that one does. It makes a nice clicking sound that I find to be soothing."

That simply drops back to the level of paranoid theory being spouted by fools.
 
Want to see the cost go back up...it is easy

Just get all the analysts to go back to predicting shortages

As recently as a month ago energy analysts were predicting shortages

That drives up the PRICE (not the cost)

If you want someone to blame, look at the financial markets

We have, in essece, just come out of a year of "panic buying" following Katrina

Luckily two things happened

The reduction in demand , as in the price got high enough that people actually used less gasoline

And the analysts finally woke up to what was staring them in the face

Basic Economics

And yes, the media DID play a part in adding to the hysteria
 
Big factors controlling prices:
1 Production- Ever notice how gas goes up around Memorial day, and down just after Labor day? That is because the EPA requires the gasoline manufacturers to wwitch formulas for the warm weather, to reduce emmisions. The summer formula has additives that increase the production costs for refining gasoline.

2 Supply- The supply of oil is controlled at a certain level by OPEC. They set the level of production in meetings. Their goal is to maximize oil prices by controlling the amount of oil produced. Keep it high, but not so high that demand drops. Like any other business.

3 Demand- that is skyrocketing due to increased economic activity in China and India. Last year there was a large demand for steel in China, which raised the prices of steel worldwide. They are a growin'.

The odd thing here is that many of the people who claim GW is an idiot are the same ones who think he is the genious shrewdly manipulating oil prices. After GW is gone, oil prices will stay high for the reasons above.

I disagree with many things that GW has done, but anyone who got a "C" in economics 101 should know that this is not one of the things he is controlling. If he were, do you REALLY think that they could keep it a secret, that some closet Democrat would not have blown the whistle by now?
 
Back
Top