Well, lately I have been doing alot of back country camping/hiking/fishing. Im talking back country as in 5-10 miles off of any marked forest road, and accessable only by foot, quad, or maybe very potent 4x4. Often I lose cell service, and am in forest areas so dense that a camp fire would not be visible from a short distance.
Well, in light of this I have started carrying things like extensive first aid kits w/ medications/prescripiton anitbiotics, and usually 2 GPS units+compass and map, etc.. Its AZ, so the black bears GENERALLY don't get that big here, usually I just have my P95 with 2 mags of hollowpoints and a rimfire rifle for small game. But, between my last 3 expeditions, I saw 2 bears large enough to make me very uneasy, and a mountain lion about the size of a large dog. None of them got close or acted aggressivley at all, but made me want to rethink my arsenal.
I want to get a better back country gun. There are not many larger caliber pistols in my price range. But I was looking at the mossberg maverick security series, as well as the stoeger coachgun (which I have owned before). It seems that a 12 gauge slug, being about .73 inches in diameter, with close to 600 grains, 1500 fps, and around 2800-3000 ft/lbs of energy, could take down almost any animal in the world at close range.
I don't know if im wrong, Im not a biologist of any sort, but it seems that the the cheapest, and by far most effective option short of 50 cal, is going to be a security shotgun. I am mainly looking for someone who disagrees and can give me a reason why to go with a bigger handgun.
I know and trust the coachgun, and am thinking I am going to purchase another one. My dads remington 870 would begin to fail ejecting the cartridges when it got very dirty, which makes me slightly wary of pump guns.
I know the limitations of having 2 cartridges, and have some formal combat training.
Im looking for thoughts, opinions, advice, suggestions that could help me in this choice. Thanks All.
Well, in light of this I have started carrying things like extensive first aid kits w/ medications/prescripiton anitbiotics, and usually 2 GPS units+compass and map, etc.. Its AZ, so the black bears GENERALLY don't get that big here, usually I just have my P95 with 2 mags of hollowpoints and a rimfire rifle for small game. But, between my last 3 expeditions, I saw 2 bears large enough to make me very uneasy, and a mountain lion about the size of a large dog. None of them got close or acted aggressivley at all, but made me want to rethink my arsenal.
I want to get a better back country gun. There are not many larger caliber pistols in my price range. But I was looking at the mossberg maverick security series, as well as the stoeger coachgun (which I have owned before). It seems that a 12 gauge slug, being about .73 inches in diameter, with close to 600 grains, 1500 fps, and around 2800-3000 ft/lbs of energy, could take down almost any animal in the world at close range.
I don't know if im wrong, Im not a biologist of any sort, but it seems that the the cheapest, and by far most effective option short of 50 cal, is going to be a security shotgun. I am mainly looking for someone who disagrees and can give me a reason why to go with a bigger handgun.
I know and trust the coachgun, and am thinking I am going to purchase another one. My dads remington 870 would begin to fail ejecting the cartridges when it got very dirty, which makes me slightly wary of pump guns.
I know the limitations of having 2 cartridges, and have some formal combat training.
Im looking for thoughts, opinions, advice, suggestions that could help me in this choice. Thanks All.