Deer hunting study

mikejonestkd

New member
Take a look a this study from South Carolina on deer hunting:

http://www.dnr.sc.gov/wildlife/deer/articlegad.html

It is interesting to note the average range that hunters shot deer at, how far they travelled after being hit, the types of calibers that were effective and the effect bullet construction had on the recovery rate

here are the conclusions from the study:

Conclusions

Shooting percentages about 82%.
The farther the shot, the lower the chance of getting the deer.
Deer ran about 62 yards on average.
Shot placement is determining factor. All things considered, broadside shoulder shot worked best compared to others.
About 50:50, deer run vs. deer don’t run.
Trained dog expedited recovery of all deer that ran.
Dog very important in recovering 61 deer that left poor/no sign, 24 deer judged unrecoverable, and 19 live/wounded deer.
Dog accounted for approximately 15 – 20% of total harvest on hunting area, i.e. 75 – 100 deer.
No difference in effectiveness of various calibers.
No difference between factory vs. custom firearms.
Significant difference between bullet types. This study indicates that rapidly expanding bullets lead to deer running less often and less distance and when they run they leave better sign.
 
No difference in effectiveness of various calibers.


reinforces the idea that shot placement and shooter performance are more important than what gun you carry......much to the disdain of the "one shot wonder" gun enthusiasts.:D
 
Back
Top