We had poster in another thread state that he was surprised how many people would shoot if someone tried to take away their gun. He believes that a handgun is property and you can't use deadly force to prevent someone from taking it.
I can't even conceive of a thought like this crossing my mind. If I'm in enough fear of death or serious bodily injury from someone to pull a gun, it's going to get used if they try to take it from me.
Anyone else believe that they can't use deadly force to retain their weapon? Is this actually taught somewhere?
I stand by my statement. If someone is trying to take your handgun does not mean that you are automatically authorized to use deadly force. A handgun is property. You cant use deadly force to protect property. It's a very rare situation where you can use deadly force for what someone might do.
I can't even conceive of a thought like this crossing my mind. If I'm in enough fear of death or serious bodily injury from someone to pull a gun, it's going to get used if they try to take it from me.
Anyone else believe that they can't use deadly force to retain their weapon? Is this actually taught somewhere?