DA/SA semi auto shotgun?

B

balazona

New member
Why there is not any DA/SA semi auto shotgun by any manufacturer in the market.
A DA/SA shotgun will be as safe as any DA/SA pistol with loaded chamber.
Please share your thoughts.
 
Don't know why you'd want one. :confused:

I've been using long guns all my life, every single one of them with a trigger no heavier than 4 or 5 lbs. Some of them as light as 3. I've never had an ND because the trigger was too light. It confuses me as to why someone would deliberately make the trigger heavier than it needs to be.

The only time I'd find this acceptable would be in a handgun that does not have a manual safety, such as a revolver or a Glock. In those cases, the heavier trigger pull acts as a safety of sorts. On the other hand, every long gun I've ever handled has a built in safety of some kind, just like a M1911, that blocks the trigger and/or the sear from moving. This means it doesn't NEED to have a heavier trigger pull, as the safety can be engaged until such time as it's necessary to fire the weapon, which allows the operator to safely carry a loaded weapon.
 
Last edited:
A long gun can be made drop safe without making it DA/SA. The Mossberg 590A1, for instance, was designed to be drop safe but isn't a double action design. I believe it's simply a matter of putting a spring on the firing pin so it can't move freely. I believe you can also make the pin itself light enough so that a strike on the primer without the hammer behind it won't be heavy enough to set off the primer.
 
We recently had a thread discussing the various ways to keep a pump shotgun at the ready. It came down to the two typical camps: 1. Round in the chamber, hammer cocked with the safety engaged vs. 2. Chamber empty and the hammer down (unlocked). There's the third condition with the camber empty and the hammer cocked, but not many folks consider it a "ready" condition. One member didn't like either version, he didn't want to have to pump in a shell and he didn't like the idea of having the hammer cocked. At the time, I opined that a shotgun with a SA/DA trigger would fit his bill. When you go to a ready condition with a loaded gun, you hit the de-cocker, not the safety. It would put the simplicity of the DA revolver's "just pull the trigger" in a shotgun.

I think there's a significant market for tactical and HD shotguns with SA/DA triggers and de-cockers once people get used to the idea. I don't want one on the Skeet field nor the duck blind; but, when something goes bump in the night… it would be nice not to have to have the gun in a compromise ready condition.

Scattergun Bob, or any any other senior tactical shotgun trainers out there… Do you have any experience with shotguns that have a similar trigger operation as your student's service handgun? IMHO, it make sense for the tactical shotgunner to have the same trigger operation with his shotgun as his sidearm. Or, is there some reason it's to be avoided?
 
I think it was because LEO's were being issued sidearms with 8-9 pound pulls, and when switching to the 4-5 pound pull of a standard shottie they were getting unexpected dead guys. Or at least unexpected booms....

A hardware solution to a software problem, obviously.


Larry
 
Why semi auto pistols are drop safe?

If a pistol can drop then a shotgun can be too.specialy in a stressful situation.
 
Zippy - could you imagine your P-gun with an 8# pull? The flinches that would occur?

But mostly semi auto shotguns are not drop safe.
Click to expand...

OP - if you're in a situation where you might be dropping your gun before the first shot, the perhaps you need to leave the chamber empty. A DA pull won't help in that situation.

You're also forcing someone to focus on another aspect in what could be a highly stressful situation - does he really need to squeeze the trigger or lightly touch it? Doesn't matter if it is SD or tournament time - in either case, IMO, you'll be increasing the chances of a first shot miss.

Personally, I prefer NO safeties on my guns, because they aren't loaded until I am ready to shoot. Maybe that's why I prefer S&W and Glocks over 1911's - one less thing to think about.

YMMV
 
I hope the lawyers don't read this post, just gives them fodder for law suits against the gun makers, then we'll all have double action shotguns and rifles with 10-15 pound trigger pulls.
 
Personally, I'm not a Glock "lover" - but I do own a few, along with 1911, revolvers, etc. This isn't about their trigger. Mossberg's safeties are manual as are Remington's. Neither that or a DA trigger is going to help in a drop situation. Why do you think it would?
 
Oneounceload,
I could be way off the mark with this; but, as I recall the whole "drop" question is really not about safety, but it's an embargo issue. To prevent the importation of "cheap Saturday-night specials" the US import regulations initiated the drop test, among other requirements. If I'm correct, it doesn't apply to domestic arms. You can buy a drop-susceptible US made Single Action Army replica revolver, but an imported version must pass the drop test.
 
Mossberg 590DA1

I own a Mossberg 590DA1. Trigger pull is much longer than your single action shotgun, but it isn't that bad either. Racking the shotgun half-cocks the hammer. Pulling the trigger cocks the hammer the rest of the way before releasing it.

Trigger assembly is metal, has the thick barrel too like the 590A1. It did come with a plastic safety though. 590DA1 is stamped on the side of the receiver and bottom where you load. Serial # starts with DA...
 
Maybe I missed the boat Zippy. All I have ever heard was a shotgun, if dropped on the butt hard enough, with a round in the chamber MAY go KABOOM. I'm not sure it is worth the risk - I lost a shooting friend when the same thing happened with his varmint rifle - shooting across the hood of his truck, he backed up to do something, his rifle started sliding, he went to grab it as the stock hit the ground and the 22-250 took most of his head off. So, in that regard, MY preference is to keep the chamber empty.
 
Zippy13 writes:
There's the third condition with the camber empty and the hammer cocked, but not many folks consider it a "ready" condition.
Click to expand...
It's referred to as "cruiser ready." All one has to do is hit the action release and work the action to chamber.
 
It's referred to as "cruiser ready." All one has to do is hit the action release and work the action to chamber.
Click to expand...
and prevents idiots from working your gun if they get their hands on it before you.
 
Shawn Dodson correctly observed:
Zippy13 writes
There's the third condition with the camber empty and the hammer cocked, but not many folks consider it a "ready" condition.
Click to expand...
It's referred to as "cruiser ready." All one has to do is hit the action release and work the action to chamber.
Click to expand...
Thomme added:
and prevents idiots from working your gun if they get their hands on it before you.
Click to expand...
I thought the condition was used to prevent the action from bouncing opening when a vertically stowed unit was subjected to a rough road. This is not a situation normally encountered by a HD gun. Past threads have discussed the merits of having having an empty chamber locked, or not. The one referenced, as I recall, was considering only loaded and cocked vs. unloaded and unlocked. Sorry if I inadvertently down-played the significance of locked and unloaded, or "cruiser" ready.
-----------
oneounceload responded to several comments about shotgun drop hazard:
All I have ever heard was a shotgun, if dropped on the butt hard enough, with a round in the chamber MAY go KABOOM... MY preference is to keep the chamber empty.
Click to expand...
We're in the same boat there. My safety of choice is an open action.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top