CZ SP-01 or HK USP Tactical 45

K

KLR650guy

Inactive
I have the opportunity to buy one of these two handguns. I am conflicted. I know both are the best for their respective company's. I don't care for the 9mm vs 45 difference. I care for the absolute quality, reliability, best, not to be ultimately disappointed gun. I also don't care for the price either. This decision has been pretty tough for me. I just want to know your guy's opinions.

Thanks

Regards.
 
They are both great. If they are used, go for the one that looks like it has been cared for the best. I have an SP01 and I like it.
 
I don't know how you would likely be disappointed with either. Both are based on fantastic hell for stout platforms. Both have a rabid and damn near irrational fan base.

Basically it comes down to which works better for you.
Steel or poly
9 or .45
Manual of arms.

I like the HK more because I prefer the control scheme.

Point is you can go fast and turn well in a Mustang GT350 or a Porsche Cayman GT4. Is one really better then the otherofcoursetheporscheis not really it's all about how you want to attack the track.

Seriously pick the one that blows your skirt up more you will be happy with either.
 
Last edited:
I forgot. Blah blah blah 9mm.......45 set for stun. Blah blah blah .45 so slow that you will dodge it like NEO on speed.

9mm kind of like a gun only for girls.
.45 awesome gun if your 70.

I could go on :).
 
Hand size comes into play as well. I have itty bitty girly hands and even though I like .45s they can require more work to shoot well in many cases vs smaller .40/9mm frames. CZ makes a very nice feeling frame to me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top