Cz-70

M

meatgrinder42

New member
I've been looking for another pistol to have some fun with and to carry for my CCW instead of my Gov. 1911. I ran across the CZ70 and I like the look and I've found ammo for it for a good price (I think). I just have a few questions about it.

1. Is the 7.65 also 32 auto? Or am I mistaken?
2. What's the overall verdict on these? I mean they're darn cheap in price.
 
Yes. It's 32 a.c.p.

If your primary interest is a Concealed Carry Weapon, the Kel-Tec P-32 is a far better weapon (smaller, lighter, good reputation, unlike come K-T products.) It won't cost that much more -- especially if you go used.

If you have Curio & Relics FFL, the CZ-70 is C&R. They're good little guns, but a bit large and heavy for the caliber. They're almost the same gun as the CZ-50, with a few minor improvements (and, maybe, a little better steel and heat treatment.) Finding mags may be a problem, as they're generally available only used. I had a CZ-50, and it outshot my friend's Walther WWII PPKS in the same caliber.

For something just to play with, you could do worse.
 
Your pistol will likely be stamped 7.65. It shoots .32 ACP, AKA .32 auto.
Well made guns, bad DA trigger. That can be improved significantly by cutting 3/8" off the hammer spring without compromising reliability.
 
Last edited:
Walt- I looked up the P32 and I'm not sure I like it. I wouldn't be using it as a strict CC weapon, it would be something to shoot at the range that also fits my fiance's hand better than my 1911 which is huge for her.
 
Finding mags may be a problem, as they're generally available only used.
Click to expand...
+1, and be aware that many of the CZ 70s currently offered by the importers come with NO mag (I kid you not!) and the availability of spares seems to be very spotty.
If your primary interest is a Concealed Carry Weapon, the Kel-Tec P-32 is a far better weapon (smaller, lighter, good reputation, unlike ome K-T products.) It won't cost that much more -- especially if you go used.
Click to expand...

Also +1.

FWIW if you really want to go vintage, I suggest looking at the FN Browning 1910/1922 series; they're rugged, reasonably priced, AND spare mags are widely and cheaply available. The main downside is that they're single-action so you MUST use the safety.
 
I'm a total CZ fanatic (7 at this time) and would not go for the 70 because of the mag issue and the weight. I have a KelTec P32 and like it a lot for pocket carry when I can't carry bigger concealed. I do like the CZ 83 in mak or the 82 in 380 or 32 for better feel and for range use. Better ergonomics and trigger than the 70 series IMO.
 
A CZ-82 in 9x18 would be a good alternative. It's clearly a better weapon, and not a LOT bigger than the CZ-70. It'll be just a bit more to handle in terms of recoil, but not terribly so. Ammo will be cheaper and probably easier to find.

The CZ-82 (and the almost identical CZ-83) is a much better design with better features and abilities. You can find nice '82s for under $200.

You'll have a hard time finding a CZ-82 in .32, but the CZ-83 in .32 is around; CZ still makes them; it no longer exports the 9x18 version to the US, so .380 or .32 is the choice there. They're quite a it more costly than the CZ-82.
 
The CZ-70 is a pretty good gun, overall.

Pros:
-It's pretty accurate.
-Very durable.
-Very reliable.
-Low price.
-Much milder recoil than the .380's and 9x18's of a similar design.
-Simple/low maintenance
-Cool factor, they're unusual and interesting, not too many people have one.

Cons:
-DA trigger is very heavy (SA trigger is just ok).
-The placement of the mag release is awkward.
-Once the mag is released you have to really have to pull to get the mag out.
-The "waffle" pattern grip is strange and IMO pretty uncomfortable, the grip on its nearly identical predecessor, the CZ-50 is much more comfortable, so much so that I put the 50 grips on my 70.
-And lastly (even though I have no qualms with carrying a .32acp, in fact I carry a Kel-Tec P-32 myself), these days you can get a fair amount more firepower in a package of the size/weight of a CZ-70.

Keep in mind a couple of these cons can be somewhat mitigated.
 
Upon looking around I've found a decently priced East German Makarov in a LGS and am strongly considering it. It's the 9x18 as one could guess. I think it's pretty light-weight for being a steel gun and I've read pretty good reviews on it. I am still thinking about buying a CZ for my fiance to put in her purse but I think myself I've going for the Makarov.
 
meatgrinder42 said:
Upon looking around I've found a decently priced East German Makarov in a LGS and am strongly considering it. It's the 9x18 as one could guess. I think it's pretty light-weight for being a steel gun and I've read pretty good reviews on it. I am still thinking about buying a CZ for my fiance to put in her purse but I think myself I've going for the Makarov.
Click to expand...

If you're going the Makarov route, the East German ones are generally the best. (Some of the Bulgarian-made ones have been almost as good, if the ones I've handled are typical.) You usually have to pay a pretty big premium when buying the EG Maks. If the price is reasonable, jump on it.

The Maks aren't the most pleasant gun to shoot, but that's generally true of all of the 9x18 guns. A CZ-82 might be as good a choice, but making that claim will probably start a lengthy argument here...
 
I do not find the maks unpleasant to shoot at all. They just recoil differently because they have a fixed barrel. If the gun is in good shape and the price is right grab it. You can shoot cheap russian ammo all day long. The prices are going up and up on the EG maks. The Maks are easy to take apart parts are plentyful and cheap if need be. The sights suck but I get by with mine. A good clean EG mak will go for about $400 now.
 
Last edited:
CZ 70

I would concur..it's not a bad gun...for it's time...I've owned mine since 2002, and of course, the usual beefs about it...too heavy, stiff trigger, and hard to find, empty magazines..It does shoot fairly well...of course, there's a slew of guns within it's class out there..and far better....It's not my main gun, but I would have no problem if conditions force me to use it only...one thing I've found to be helpful, is a through cleaning and oiling, from time to time..
 
I have had my CZ70 for a couple of years. The trigger is kind of stiff and it doesn't fit my XL hands well. Other than that I have nothing bad to say about it. It has been completely reliable and seems like it will be very durable. If you are okay with the caliber it is a good service pistol.

CZ70_zpsfb310995.jpg
 
Last edited:
A ghost-post, but FWIW, I don't believe the CZ70 was then, or is now, a C&R gun. The CZ50 is, but not the 70.
 
jonnyc said:
A ghost-post, but FWIW, I don't believe the CZ70 was then, or is now, a C&R gun. The CZ50 is, but not the 70.
Click to expand...

jonnyc is right. My error, earlier, when I wrote that it was.

The CZ-50 is C&R, and while the CZ-70 is almost the same weapon, it's not C&R. (CZ did a better job with metal hardening on the CZ-70 --and there's no problem with galling on the underside of the slide which could eventually make the CZ-50 inoperable. The CZ-70 is the better way to go if you plan to shoot a lot.)

You may have to wait a few years for it to earn C&R status. (The CZ-82, which is a newer weapon, has that status, thanks to a Museum Curator request to the BATF.) For the minor difference in purchase price and availability of parts, I'd much rather have the CZ-82.
 
Last edited:
I think the CZ82 is 9mm Makarov only. If I understand correctly, the CZ83 is the commercial version. I believe that it is available in 9mm Makarov, 380, and (rarely) 32acp.

My FiL has a CZ83, and it is an excellent pistol. I like my CZ70 okay, but his CZ83 seems like a better gun.

Walt knows all of this. I am just babbling. :)
 
I have and love my CZ70.
As mentioned, the DA trigger just sucks.... close to 20# I'm guessing but my SA is much better,,, maybe 8#-10#.

It is accurate but heavy for carry but as a range gun it's very nice since the weight eats up all the .32ACP recoil. It is also a cool looking gun. I bought Marschal grips for it which cost $100+ but was worth it. I have 6 mags for it but don't remember how I got that many. It came with no mags when I bought it but it was cheap.



I see it's a 4 year old thread but the 70's are a lot older than that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top