You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
curious as to the following. anyone know?
- Thread starter alan
- Start date
tintcutter
New member
Don't get too caught up in the caliber names. They are just that, names. The name of a caliber is intended to keep you straight on which is which more than any other reason. For example, there are an amazing number of wildcat cartridges. Many have come to production and with all the factory rounds from history on top of those, it is already confusing enough. Then for true confusion, add foreign calibers. When a new shooter begins to get a glimmer of awareness of the subtlety than can differentiate some rounds from others of a real similiar nature, questions like yours come up (with good reason I think) but a good reloading manual will straighten it all out.
I would think there are some AK guru types around here to fill in the details. You have me curious also.
I would think there are some AK guru types around here to fill in the details. You have me curious also.
Last edited:
No good reason. 7.62 mm converts to .300" which is the bore diameter of the 7.62 NATO, .30-'06, etc. .308" is the groove diameter. Why the Russians chose a bit larger bullet and why they called it 7.62mm (instead of, say, 7.7mm/.303"), I have no idea and I doubt anyone does at this stage.
I do happen to know why .30 was chosen by the U.S., though. Around 1890, when the Army was experimenting with reducing the standard rifle caliber from .45 to something smaller, an officer at Frankford Arsenal decided to use .30 (.308), thus setting the standard U.S. rifle caliber for the next 75 years. When asked why he chose .30, he replied that "it seemed like a nice round number."
Thus are decisions made.
Jim
I do happen to know why .30 was chosen by the U.S., though. Around 1890, when the Army was experimenting with reducing the standard rifle caliber from .45 to something smaller, an officer at Frankford Arsenal decided to use .30 (.308), thus setting the standard U.S. rifle caliber for the next 75 years. When asked why he chose .30, he replied that "it seemed like a nice round number."
Thus are decisions made.
Jim
Jim Keenan offered:
No good reason. 7.62 mm converts to .300" which is the bore diameter of the 7.62 NATO, .30-'06, etc. .308" is the groove diameter. Why the Russians chose a bit larger bullet and why they called it 7.62mm (instead of, say, 7.7mm/.303"), I have no idea and I doubt anyone does at this stage.
I do happen to know why .30 was chosen by the U.S., though. Around 1890, when the Army was experimenting with reducing the standard rifle caliber from .45 to something smaller, an officer at Frankford Arsenal decided to use .30 (.308), thus setting the standard U.S. rifle caliber for the next 75 years. When asked why he chose .30, he replied that "it seemed like a nice round number."
Thus are decisions made.
****
Jim:
Now that you mention it, it does seem like a nice, round number, however chambering a U.S. 30 caliber round in a Russian rifle, assuming that the bolt would close, isn't likely to present a problem. The other way round, again assuming that the bolt would close, you have a bullet diameter perhaps .003 - .004 oversize, which could raise pressures significantly, or so it seems. I had thought that, re how decisions were made, that one closed their eyes, turned around several times, and then tried to pin the tail on a donkey.
The old FA Match bullet, the one that U.S. 30 caliber Match Ammunition was loaded with, nominally 173 grains, a few I've weighed scaled 175, no big thing. These 30 caliber projectiles miked .308 - .309" dia, and I once came upon some Norma Match Bullets, I think they were Norma, that miked .309"dia. Had no trouble firing them in a Garand.
That old adage about watching what you stick in that chamber comes to mind, though in this case, watch the bullet diameter. Anyhow, I started out curious, and remain curious.
No good reason. 7.62 mm converts to .300" which is the bore diameter of the 7.62 NATO, .30-'06, etc. .308" is the groove diameter. Why the Russians chose a bit larger bullet and why they called it 7.62mm (instead of, say, 7.7mm/.303"), I have no idea and I doubt anyone does at this stage.
I do happen to know why .30 was chosen by the U.S., though. Around 1890, when the Army was experimenting with reducing the standard rifle caliber from .45 to something smaller, an officer at Frankford Arsenal decided to use .30 (.308), thus setting the standard U.S. rifle caliber for the next 75 years. When asked why he chose .30, he replied that "it seemed like a nice round number."
Thus are decisions made.
****
Jim:
Now that you mention it, it does seem like a nice, round number, however chambering a U.S. 30 caliber round in a Russian rifle, assuming that the bolt would close, isn't likely to present a problem. The other way round, again assuming that the bolt would close, you have a bullet diameter perhaps .003 - .004 oversize, which could raise pressures significantly, or so it seems. I had thought that, re how decisions were made, that one closed their eyes, turned around several times, and then tried to pin the tail on a donkey.
The old FA Match bullet, the one that U.S. 30 caliber Match Ammunition was loaded with, nominally 173 grains, a few I've weighed scaled 175, no big thing. These 30 caliber projectiles miked .308 - .309" dia, and I once came upon some Norma Match Bullets, I think they were Norma, that miked .309"dia. Had no trouble firing them in a Garand.
That old adage about watching what you stick in that chamber comes to mind, though in this case, watch the bullet diameter. Anyhow, I started out curious, and remain curious.