Criminal activity and assault-type handguns: a study of young adults.

Dead

New member
Could not find the full article, just the abstract. Interesting, what 'they' will say.

Criminal activity and assault-type handguns: a study of young adults.

Wintemute GJ, Wright MA, Parham CA, Drake CM, Beaumont JJ

Violence Prevention Research Program, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, USA. gjwintemute@ucdavis.edu

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We studied a population of young adults who legally purchased handguns to determine whether an association exists between the purchase of an assault-type handgun and prior or subsequent criminal activity. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal study of 5,360 legally authorized purchasers of handguns in California in 1988 who were younger than 25 years at the time of purchase. Our main outcome measures were (1) adjusted relative risk (RR) for the purchase of an assault-type handgun for subjects with a criminal history compared with subjects without such a history and (2) adjusted RR for new criminal activity during the 3 years after handgun purchase for purchasers of assault-type handguns compared with purchasers of other handguns. RRs were adjusted for sex and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Handgun purchasers with a criminal history were more likely than those with no criminal history to purchase assault-type handguns (4.6% and 2.0%, respectively; RR = 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 2.8). Among handgun purchasers who had a criminal history, purchasers of assault-type handguns were more likely than purchasers of other handguns to be charged with new offenses (RR = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.3 to 1.9), including offenses involving firearms of violence (RR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3 to 2.20. Among those who had previously been charged with Violent Crime Index offenses (murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault), those who purchased assault-type handguns were more than twice as likely as purchasers of other handguns to be charged with a new offense (RR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.5 to 3.4) and three times as likely to be charged with a new offense involving firearms or violence (RR = 3.0, 95% CI, 1.9 to 4.6). CONCLUSION: In this population, the purchase of an assault-type handgun was associated with both prior and subsequent criminal activity.

Comments:
Comment in: Ann Emerg Med 1998 Jul;32(1):77-9
Comment in: Ann Emerg Med 1999 Jan;33(1):126-7

------------------
Dead [Black Ops]
 
Not only that but how in the hell are people with established histories of criminal activity - especially violent activity - able to buy any type of handgun under Brady or NICS?
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal study of 5,360 legally authorized purchasers of handguns in California in 1988...[/quote]

Ten years later they report these facts as if they have anything to do with today's crime rates. This study was done prior to the widespread (31 states) implementation of Concealed Carry Laws, and prior to Brady and NICS.

Prior to President Bush, and to the Rosie O'Donnell show, and to Madonna being a mommy, and to OJ and Lance Ito, and to the Loma Prieta Earthquake, and to the fall of the Berlin Wall.

For Pete's sake! This is just being dredged up in hopes that some anti can use it against some unprepared gun owner. Let's do them one better, lets pull up gun stats from the 50s and 60s prior to GCA '68...

------------------
RKBA!
"The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security"
Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 4
Concealed Carry is illegal in Ohio.
Ohioans for Concealed Carry Website
 
Back
Top