I have a Coonan Model A (one of the 1500 produced). It uses the swinging link of the 1911. The Model B (the bulk of production, and essentially the gun being made today as the Coonan Classic) uses the cam system found on many other pistols, such as Sigs.
The smooth grips, though do not give the firm friction I want in a carry gun, so would replace them with checkered ones for every day carry.
I agree about the smooth grip panels. My gun came with a set of rubber grips (origin unknown, but the were clearly made for the Coonan), and when I replaced the wood with the rubber, the gun felt MUCH better in my hands.
Would it be better to consider a DE .357 instead of this?
That all depends on what you want out of the gun. I have had two .357 Desert Eagles, and currently have a .44 Mag. All were the early model guns, now called Mark I's.
The only thing the Coonan and the Desert Eagle have in common is the .357 Magnum chamber, and both are handguns.
The Coonan is, essentially a 1911 style or pattern pistol. It is a slightly scaled up duty gun. The Desert Eagle is a much different design, significantly larger, and much heavier (4.25lbs empty). It does not use the Browning tilt barrel lockup, and is gas operated. It an entirely different beast.
Is it as fussy on ammo as the DE is?
I have no idea how fussy the DE is or what makes it so. Feeding? Cycling the action? or the inadvisability of using cast lead in a gas gun?
Both guns are "fussy" about ammo, meaning that they both need full power .357 ammo to cycle the action reliably. The recoil operated Coonan doesn't care if the ammo is jacketed or cast, only that it has enough "oomph".
The Desert Eagle needs jacketed bullet ammo, only. Lead bullet ammo can clog the gas system, and the design of the gas system makes part of it extremely difficult, if not impossible to clean. There are gas operated designs that can be fully disassembled and cleaned if they get plugged with lead, powder residue & bullet lube, but the Desert Eagle isn't one of them. SO NO LEAD BULLETS in the DE, or its very likely you will, at some point be looking at buying another barrel assembly. The maker tells you not to run lead, and does not warranty the gun repair if you do.
My experience is that both guns run fine on handloads that are tailored to the gun.
Also, just FYI, velocities from the autos are significantly higher than "equal barrel length" revolvers. While I don't have any data from the Coonan, I do from an early DE .357, which was clocked launching 125gr JHPs at 1720fps from its 6" polygonal rifling barrel. The same load was 50fps slower in a 6" S&W N frame, and 100fps faster than from a 6" S&W Model 19. Also that load (and no, I'm not going to tell,) was too hot for the M19, cases could not be extracted by hand alone. The N frame (M28) cases extracted normally.
And the DE ate them like candy.