Topher127 said:
Does any one have any experience with having a concealed permit and dealing with social services? My wife and I are looking to adopt and will need to have a home study done. Will they be looking for something like that or will it be held against us? I've been holding of on my application until this one is done, but I'm wondering about future cases. I'm in southwestern VA.
Been there, done that.
Our adoption was an international adoption, from a country that doesn't directly recognize any American adoption services agencies, and the United States doesn't recognize any adoption services agencies in the child's native country (if there are any). So we had to handle much of the paper shuffling ourselves. Nonetheless, because the U.S. ratified the Hague convention on international adoptions just as we began the process, we were subject to that, and one of the requirements is a home study by an agency accredited in the country of the adoptive parents. So we did a home study.
Our home study was done through Catholic Family Services (or Catholic Charities, as they now call themselves). The entire home study process was ... daunting. It's a lot more than having someone come look at the house and verify that the heat and water function and the layer of dirt on the floor isn't too thick. If I recall, before we even got to the home visit we went through a series of at least a dozen 1-hour, sit-down interrogations of me and my wife by the adoption social worker.
We covered all sorts of things, from both of our family histories (to see if there was any background of abuse on either side -- there wasn't), police reports on both of us to document that we had no criminal convictions (we didn't). Discussion of mental health histories, for us and for our relatives and parental units. Income tax returns for the past three (or five?) years. Overall, it was extremely invasive. I'm a Vietnam veteran, and I'm guessing the adoption social worker had never seen one 'o them before, because she asked me to get a police clearance report
from Vietnam documenting that I had never been arrested or charged with child abuse in Vietnam. After I caught my breath from laughing myself out of the chair, I asked her if she was fully aware that she was asking me to get a clearance report from the people who were trying to kill me when I was there. (She finally settled for a report from the U.S. Army records center that, to the best of their knowledge, they had no record of me being charged with any crimes while in Vietnam.)
I don't remember exactly where in the sequence
GUNZ! came up, but it did. Initially, she was shocked that I owned "a" gun. Then it became clear that I own more than one gun. "How many?" "I don't know, I haven't counted for awhile" was perhaps not quite the answer she was looking for. We got through that when I reminded her that I AM a military veteran, that I was trained to bear arms, and that as a veteran I view my oath to defend the Constitution as a life-long commitment, and I view being armed as simply having the means to fulfill that commitment.
So we got past that, to the question of storage. My state requires that guns be stored under lock if there are children under the age of sixteen in the house, and the child we were adopting was under sixteen. So even if I had not had a "residential security container" for the guns, I would have had to buy one to satisfy both state law and the home study. However, I already had one. So that part was okay.
What really threw me was that she also wanted ALL ammunition to be stored under lock. That was a problem -- I reload, and I have both handguns and long guns in multiple calibers. I have stashes of mil-surp ammo in three or four calibers, amounting to a thousand or two or three of each type. For the handgun caliber I shoot most (.45 Auto), I have no idea how many thousands of rounds I had at the time, and the same applied to .22LR. State law here does NOT require locked storage for ammunition, although she tried to tell me it did. Once she saw I wasn't buying her story, she fell back on the "Well, WE require it" bit. So I scrounged a pair of old metal office supplies cabinets from a company that had moved to new headquarters and was tossing most of the furniture from the old building, put hasps and padlocks on the cabinets, and I had locking ammo storage. That satisfied her.
We had the same argument over a carbon monoxide detector. She said it was required by "code." Since that happens to be how I earn my living, I knew that "the code" only requires CO detectors in new houses, there is no requirement to retrofit a house that was built 60+ years ago. "Well, WE require it" came up yet again. So we went to Lowe's and bought a plug-in CO detector for the bedroom that was designated as the kid's bedroom.
We live in the country and we get our water from a well, so we had to have the water tested. I don't recall for sure, but I think we also had to have the house tested for Radon.
Basically, be ready for any number of unexpected and off-the-wall questions and demands. Obviously, it doesn't really matter if what they ask for is really required by any law or code, because if you don't make them happy you don't get your home study approval, so prepare yourself to smile no matter what ridiculous demands they throw at you, make jokes, keep it light and friendly, and lead the social worker to believe that you're a good guy.
Back to guns. My wife is rabidly anti-gun, but I had the guns before I met her so she knows they aren't going away. I think it helped that my wife could tell the social worker that she hates guns but that she recognizes I am responsible with them and she could confirm that I take my oath as a soldier/veteran seriously, so she "allows" me to keep my guns.
It also probably helped that my wife honestly has no idea how many I have -- I think she has only seen two or three of them. The social worker in our case did not ask to see the guns. She saw the safe, she saw the storage cabinets with padlocks, and by that time we were on sufficiently amicable terms that she didn't feel it necessary to take an inventory. I would guess that each social worker approaches this differently, and probably somewhat subjectively depending on how the overall interaction has been going through the home study process.
I hope that helps. Feel free to drop me a PM if you have specific questions.