maestro pistolero
New member
Since Scalia came out and said arms that are in 'common use at the time' are protected, wouldn't a ban on say 9mm with a 15 or so round capacity be extremely vulnerable to a challenge?
Even if the 'common use' term only refers to common use by the public, not military, (and I don't think that was the intent) a run of the mill, double stack, 9mm ought to be at the top of the list of protected weapons.
Am I missing something?
Even if the 'common use' term only refers to common use by the public, not military, (and I don't think that was the intent) a run of the mill, double stack, 9mm ought to be at the top of the list of protected weapons.
Am I missing something?