Commentary on VT shooting and firearms

jimpeel

New member
This is a good site which monitors the Liberal press and reports on their "take" on issues including the firearms issue.

http://www.businessandmedia.org/

This is a recent commentary on their site. Now, you guys refrain from sending her love notes and marriage proposals, okay? :p

http://www.businessandmedia.org/commentary/2007/20070425142033.aspx

Commentary
Media to U.S.: Lose the Guns, Get Sophisticated
Journalists bemoan American 'gun culture,' ignoring facts and common sense in their dramatic attempts at persuasion.

By Amy Menefee
Business & Media Institute
4/25/2007 2:23:35 PM

I’m a rare combination: a trained journalist who grew up understanding the value of guns.

My dad taught me how to shoot and made sure I understood safety, my rights and my responsibility – namely, that the government wouldn’t be around if I suddenly needed protection.

I’ve been rather queasy reading and hearing journalists’ take on the Virginia Tech shooting.

One of the worst articles I’ve seen was purely coincidental. Marie Claire magazine’s May issue – which would have gone to press before the tragic rampage on April 16 – featured a stomach-turning essay by Sarah Liston, a woman who used to enjoy firearms ownership.

She, like me, grew up in the gun-friendly South and moved to a big city on the East Coast. But our similarities end there.

Liston chronicled her journey to supposed enlightenment in the most clichéd of ways, describing her Texan roots in a “throwback environment” that kept women down. She found “exhilarating” power in wielding a gun, until she left the “Wild West” for modern New York. Predictably, she found “compassion” in her new liberal surroundings and was horrified to see, with new eyes, the culture she’d escaped when she eventually visited Dallas again.

“I realized I no longer needed a gun to feel powerful,” Liston wrote. “If anything, my willingness to be vulnerable makes me stronger.”

No crime victim ever reveled in, or gained strength from, his or her vulnerability. But the way Liston talked about exhilarating power as a leading purpose for gun ownership, maybe we should be glad she permanently holstered her weapon. A need for power sounds like the psychological red flags we’ve heard so much about when it comes to dangerous individuals.

But this is the commentary of the enlightened, and The New Yorker added an unbelievable column following the shooting.

“There is no reason that any private citizen in a democracy should own a handgun. At some point, that simple truth will register. Until it does, phones will ring for dead children, and parents will be told not to ask why.” That was the dramatic interpretation of Adam Gopnik in The New Yorker.

It’s easy to dismiss those as elitist commentaries, naturally out of touch with the American public. In an ABC News poll released April 23, 45 percent of respondents said their households contained guns – not exactly a fringe group.

But that hasn’t stopped the media’s echoing calls for nationwide gun bans. It hasn’t stopped the misguided notion that more regulation and fewer freedoms for the law-abiding would stop determined killers.

More regulation hasn’t helped Britain, though ABC News glowingly portrayed that nation’s gun ban and touted it as preventing school shootings. In England and Wales, the number of gun murders has remained relatively unchanged despite the ban, while overall gun crime has risen a whopping 242 percent, as The Washington Post reported.

When reporters weren’t busy nodding in agreement about more gun restrictions, they were “investigating” the place where Cho bought his gun. Some acted as though the store was continuing its own murder spree.

“The Roanoke Firearms store where Seung-Hui Cho bought his murder weapon has a history of selling guns involved in murders. It is the fifth time a gun sold in this store has been used in a homicide,” said ABC’s Brian Ross.

What to do? CBS reported that Roanoke Firearms sells about 2,500 guns per year. If one of those is used to commit a crime, should the store be shut down? If so, we’d better start shutting down manufacturers and sellers of kitchen knives, cars and baseball bats – all of which could be used as deadly weapons. (While we’re at it, let’s shut down grocery stores and end the “obesity epidemic.”)

It seems truer every day that neither facts nor common sense shall stand in the way of journalism. Among the many stories we don’t see are the tales of brave individuals who protect their families, friends and co-workers from harm, perhaps using the other 2,499 guns that will be sold by Roanoke Firearms this year.

While Liston, Gopnik and ABC News wax on about the sad state of a gun-friendly nation, everyday journalists should ask the tens of millions of American gun owners about their stories.

They might learn that true enlightenment means never having to say you’re sorry … that you weren’t able to protect yourself.

Amy Menefee is Deputy Editor with the Media Research Center’s Business & Media Institute outside Washington, D.C. She holds two degrees in journalism and a Smith & Wesson revolver
 
Wow! Great find! Would that she was in the majority of the media. I was also impressed with this quote:
“I realized I no longer needed a gun to feel powerful,” Liston wrote. “If anything, my willingness to be vulnerable makes me stronger.
It is is almost beyond my ability to comprehend that type of "logic." :barf: One has to wonder how many of the students at VT might have thought the same thing and that's what paralyzed their defensive response.
 
One does find Liston's line of thinking more than one would believe. I attribute it to an upbringing that indoctrinates them with the idea that to be a sheep is better than to be a wolf. From and within weakness you find your reward. The only way you can change such an outlook is one person at a time. Good article!
 
“If anything, my willingness to be vulnerable makes me stronger.”
Odd as it may seem - - I can actually comprehend that line of thinking...
although I could not disagree with it more..

More vulnerable = a better place in the handout line. Better place in the handlout line = less effort needs to be expended.

I'm going to set aside the issue of "guns" for the moment to illustrate my point.

My wife and I are doing all that we can, and then some, to provide for our retirement. It means forgoing quite a bit that others in our age group (over 50 and under 65) take as a "given" - vacations, new $40K SUV's,dining out 4 nights a week,,,$7.50 cups of coffee,,etc.
Instead, were' working 90 plus hours a week, brown bagging it,,etc.

Now, along comes a "talking head" that says people not planning for retirement are in for a rude awakening when the time comes and they have nothing put aside.

BS!!!!!

WE're the ones (those of us that are planning) that are in for a rude awakening.
When all of these **vunerable** people have nothing,,,,who do you think is going to have to pay for their way?

Yeah - I can see it pretty clear.
Vunerable and vunerability is a way of life these days in the US. the more "vunerable" you are, the more the .gov (nanny state) gives you a hand (out).
 
Here is the problem I have with that kind of thinking....

I can accept that a person has made a moral choice to 'do no harm' regardless of who or what is attacking them...that they would rather die than defend themselves. that is their choice and should be.... what I can not accept is a person would not defend others.... there is the line....

Here is the question to a pacifist: So, you believe in giving up your life before doing harm to another person, picture a mad man coming at you with a knife.... they are going to kill you.... and after you, the five children standing behind you... what do you do?
 
Saw an e-mail on this once. let's see if I can remember the responses right:

Humanistic Person response: But maybe he's not a mad man. What if he's just an angry chef running after someone who stole somthing from him? Maybe he is a mad man but that might not be his fault. He may have had a disturbing childhood and is having a difiicult time overcoming his past. I don't have enough information here to act.

Family man response: Bang!

Marine family man response: BANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANGBANG (Inserts new mag)
Daughter says "nice grouping dad!"
Wife says "shoot him again, I think he's still moving!"
 
Lol

By the way, why are the smilies not working? They are turned on but everything I post in caps is reduced to lower case so the <colon capital D> comes out as :d and thus the smilies don't work.

The above lol should have been caps but it isn't.

Any thoughts?
 
Back
Top