No, not a lawsuit. A comparison of two models. A variation on the usual Colt v. S&W theme.
Went to the range yesterday with a c. 1968 4" Colt Trooper 357. Also took along a c. 1980 4" Python. Shot them side by side at 15 yards for fun. Used two types of ammo. Both were 38 Special loadings. One was standard velocity stuff with lead bullets and the other was a +P 125 JHP load. In my experience 38s fired from a 357 lose a tad of accuracy (and velocity) but both guns were under the same handicap so should be a fair comparison.
All groups were 6 shot strings. The Trooper shaded the Python a bit with the lead bullet load. Trooper cut a 2 & 1/8" group while the Python opened up a tiny bit to 2 & 1/4". Pretty much the same.
No so with the JHP load. The Trooper did very poorly. Not sure if my fault or the gun but the Trooper shot a 4" group with the HV ammo. The Python on the other hand liked this load... a lot. Like a 1 & 3/8" group (see photo #3).
The Trooper:
The Python:
The best group:
Went to the range yesterday with a c. 1968 4" Colt Trooper 357. Also took along a c. 1980 4" Python. Shot them side by side at 15 yards for fun. Used two types of ammo. Both were 38 Special loadings. One was standard velocity stuff with lead bullets and the other was a +P 125 JHP load. In my experience 38s fired from a 357 lose a tad of accuracy (and velocity) but both guns were under the same handicap so should be a fair comparison.
All groups were 6 shot strings. The Trooper shaded the Python a bit with the lead bullet load. Trooper cut a 2 & 1/8" group while the Python opened up a tiny bit to 2 & 1/4". Pretty much the same.
No so with the JHP load. The Trooper did very poorly. Not sure if my fault or the gun but the Trooper shot a 4" group with the HV ammo. The Python on the other hand liked this load... a lot. Like a 1 & 3/8" group (see photo #3).
The Trooper:
The Python:
The best group: