(CO) Insurance firm sues gunman's parents

Oatka

New member
http://www.insidedenver.com/shooting/0701harr2.shtml

Insurance firm sues gunman's parents

Company says it doesn't have to cover Harrises in lawsuits for victims

By Peggy Lowe
Denver Rocky Mountain News Staff Writer

Wayne and Kathy Harris' homeowner insurance company sued the couple Friday, saying it doesn't have to cover them in the Columbine High victims' lawsuits.

The Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford, which is owned by Traveler's Property Casualty, asked a federal judge in Denver to relieve it from covering and defending the lawsuits filed against the parents of Eric Harris.

Eric Harris' murderous actions at Columbine during the April 20, 1999, massacre were intentional and his parents' homeowners policy only covers negligent acts, the lawsuit said.

The Harrises have been sued by the families of slain student Isaiah Shoels and wounded student Mark Taylor.

The lawsuits say the Harrises were negligent in allowing their son to amass a cache of weapons in their home, to spew his violent writings and to be friends with Dylan Klebold, his partner in the Columbine tragedy.

Scott Robinson, a Denver defense attorney, said homeowner's policies most often cover only negligent acts in parental responsibility cases. "Clearly (Eric) Harris' conduct is not insured," he said. "The harder question is the acts of the parents."

The Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford insured the Harrises under a policy that ran from May 29, 1998, to May 29, 1999. It limited payouts to $300,000 and also says the company will defend any legal actions against the homeowners.

The company has been working with the Harrises but "a real and justiciable controversy" has arisen because the family believes the insurance company should continue to defend them against the suits, the complaint said.

The Harris family lawyer, Ben Colkitt, did not return phone calls Friday seeking comment.

Although the Shoels and Taylor lawsuits were filed in state courts, the company wants a federal judge to confirm their position, said Keith Anderson, a Travelers spokesman.

The company probably believes they would be "home towned" in a state court, Robinson said, meaning a local judge would side with local residents.

A federal judge could settle the question and potentially save the company large legal fees and settlements, he said.

"If they're not covered, they're not covered," Robinson said. "That eliminates the possibility of liability and completely eliminates the duty to defend."

Contact Peggy Lowe at (303) 892-5482 or lowep@RockyMountainNews.com.


© Copyright, Denver Publishing Co.
 
I personally find the initial lawsuit crazy anyway.. Give me a break. they should not have let him be friends with someone. Or to say something. (Althought the gun part I agree with.) *Kevinw pauses to put on his Nomex* They did not pay enough attention to what was going on that is the truth. But this lawsuit is just a way for some people to get rich quick. The Harris family has suffered just like every other family in this tragedy. They lost thier son. and they must live with the knowlege of what thier son did. That is a punishment that no Justice system could ever match.
 
Sure it's crazy. And, if the insurer is found
to be not liable, look for the Harris' to sue their agent. I'm not kidding. If you're underinsured and get into some kind of mess, you can sue your insurance agent for not advising you to carry coverage for that mess.
Coming soon to your home and highway policy: the Homicidal Teen endorsement. Premium: $200.
 
I'm about to get into life insurance as soon as I leave the Navy.

This is certainly an eye-opener!

I wonder if the company for whom I am to work will require me to ask about firearms ownership when I am discussing things with a prospective client? That would chill me to the bone, to be honest.

Then again, knowing what I know I would be MORE inclined to insure the life of someone who has a CCW permit! They won't go down without a fight! :D
 
Back
Top