(CO) Handguns still hurt more than they help

Oatka

New member
Jesu, what IS the matter with these people?

The twit's email address is at the end of this piece of tripe.

Handguns still hurt more than they help

The drunk, butt-naked dead man we'll leave for later. But yes, handgun people, I am holding up my end of the bargain.

It has taken awhile. The story you insist happens every day in metro Denver finally made the newspaper. For four years I have been waiting. And waiting some more. It ran Saturday.

And good for that 63-year-old Colorado Springs man. He must be one tough gentleman. You have to like the grit of anyone willing to take on three baddies who forced their way into his home in the dead of night, who blasted them when they started getting the best of him.

He killed one of the intruders, a man they later found dead on a neighbor's lawn. Two other men the police collared when they sought treatment for their wounds at a nearby hospital. Yes, yes, yes. A man's castle — and all of that.

It does not, however, change one iota my abhorrence of handguns. What Carter Westfall did last week was, in my mind, so extraordinary it barely counts.

True, Carter Westfall today might likely be dead were it not for the .32-caliber automatic he had in his hand when the men began banging on his door shortly before 1 a.m.


Only a man with such a weapon in his hand unlocks the deadbolt when he hears the banging. Only when they busted the chain lock and shoved their way inside, knocking Carter Westfall to the floor, did he start firing. Those men got exactly what was coming to them.

Yet while one man's life was spared by his owning a handgun in his house, scores of others lose their lives at the business-end of the same abominable weapon — "tool," in the parlance of the handgun fanatics.

Let us check the ledger. What of the 15-year-old Denver boy charged last week with killing a 64-year-old church deacon during an argument in the street?

And then there were the two New Orleans teen-age boys, who on Tuesday shot and wounded each other during a fight at their middle school. Yes, boys using a gun someone passed one of them through a fence, to settle what used to be settled with shoving, maybe fists.

Everyone now is pointing to Westfall as proof we should all just leave handguns and their owners alone. They do this as scores of others in their communities drop, bleed and die.

I'll share the story of Craig Holtzman, the drunk, naked dead man. He was killed just days later in Norristown, Pa.


He'd been out drinking Tuesday night. He took his clothes off to go to sleep. Later, for reasons known only to him, he walked into his backyard to relieve himself.

The naked man, though, ended up walking through the sliding glass doors of his neighbor's home, thinking it was his.

The neighbor, no doubt fearful like Carter Westfall, grabbed his gun. He chased the drunken naked man from his home, firing and missing.

Paul J. Bellina — and this is where the problem started — then reportedly chased his neighbor into the backyard. He fired three more times, all three shots hitting his drunken naked neighbor in the head, killing him.

"The presumption you are in danger ends when the threat leaves your home," the DA in the case said. Bellina now is charged with voluntary manslaughter and reckless endangerment. He could get 20 years.

So go ahead, cheer Carter Westfall. I'll mourn the drunken, naked dead man and the others.

Bill Johnson's column appears Sunday, Wednesday and Friday. Rockybj@aol.com or (303) 892-2763.

© Copyright, Denver Publishing Co.
 
Wow, this guy has his head WAAAAAY up his ass. Where does he possibly get the idea that those who sucessfully defend themselves are less common than those who don't, assuming both are armed? The statistics don't support this. I hope you guys chastise him appropriately.

------------------
The Alcove

I twist the facts until they tell the truth. -Some intellectual sadist

The Bill of Rights is a document of brilliance, a document of wisdom, and it is the ultimate law, spoken or not, for the very concept of a society that holds liberty above the desire for ever greater power. -Me
 
Email Sent:
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>
This is in refrence to your article: http://www.rockymountainnews.com/johnson/0929johns.shtml

You have got to be kidding. I'm an Admin for www.thefiringline.com and
I personally invite you to join our discussion group and talk about this.
TFL (as we call it) is not the normal discussion forum - personal attacks and flames and such are not allowed. This is a forum for Rational Discusion of these issues.
You can express your opinions and get in response rational and logical opinions.
Among are near 7,000 members are Police Officers, Lawyers, Doctors, and people from every walk of life. Even one perticular Writer, like yourself, who has published a little book called BEST DEFENSE. He collects stories every day seem to counter your opinion in a Check-Mate manner.

Please - join us and lets talk about it.
[/quote]

So clean up the language a notch... we may get some company... :D
 
He might be more inclined to chat with people that don't make spelling mistakes.

Hey, my spelling sucks too. I just make sure that I spell it right.
 
Sounds to me like the "punish everyone for the evils of one" syndrome. I gotta stop coming to this board sometimes. The lunacy is gonna get to me! :D

------------------
Try to take away my gun...and you will see my 2nd Amendment Right in ACTION!!! -Me

FOR THE CHILDREN!!!!
 
People like that won't come here and discuss like adults. They are babys. Their parents taught them to cry when they don't get what they want. They are already set in their ways and the only way they will learn otherwise is when it impacts them personally. The sad part is, since they are antis, they won't be able to have the tables turn in their favor by a legally posessed firearm. All they will ever see is the crime and hurt. They refuse to open their eyes but claim to see all. There is a word for that....just lemme think....umm...I think it is....sphincter?
 
Sadly, PreserveFreedom is correct. Modern newspapermen don't want discussion.

They don't want truth.

They want readership, with a side order of adulation.

[This message has been edited by capnrik (edited October 01, 2000).]
 
Back
Top