CNN poll on Clinton disbarment

O

Oatka

New member
Good for the Arkansas SC! One of the few polls I thoroughly enjoyed voting "Yes".
Poll is about half-way down the page, alongside a blurb about Time magazine.

http://www.cnn.com/Should President Clinton be disbarred , as recommended by a committee of the Arkansas Supreme Court?

Yes, he lied under oath in the Paula Jones case by denying he had a sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky. 65%

No, his actions deserve nothing harsher than a letter of reprimand. 35%


------------------
The New World Order has a Third Reich odor.

[This message has been edited by Oatka (edited May 22, 2000).]
 
66% Yes, kick his lying ass out
34% No, let the p**** keep his law license.

BTW, use http://www.cnn.com

Any bets on how the Clinton News Network will report these results?

------------------
Ne Conjuge Nobiscum
"If there be treachery, let there be jehad!"
 
Done ... but the link don't work.

Chop off the "should" amd just use www.cnn.com
Scroll down and you'll see it. Go fer it !

Don't stop until ya got veins stuck in yer teeth ! :D
 
67% - 33% say Disbarr the puke

------------------
The most foolish mistake we could make would be to allow the subjected people to carry arms; history shows that all conquerers who have allowed their subjected people to carry arms have prepared their own fall.
Adolf Hitler
 
Done. Results still at 67% - 33%

There is a similar poll at www.vote.com
Their current results are 92% Yes to 8% No. The interesting thing about the vote.com polls is they send the results to the people involved in making the decisions about the poll topics.

------------------
If you're not a little upset with the way the world is going, you're not paying attention.

[This message has been edited by John Marshall (edited May 23, 2000).]
 
The next time I hear someone suggest that licensing gun owners will reduce crime, I'll make sure I point out that a law license didn't prevent clinton from breaking any!
 
From the story: Clinton said on NBC Nightly News: "The only reason I agreed even to an appeal of this is, my lawyers looked at all the precedents and they said,'There's no way in the world if they just treat you like everybody else has been treated, that this is even close to that kind of case.'

What about when they said the commander in cheif of the Armed Forces didn't need to be treated like the rest of the military when it comes to adultry. How many soldiers have lost their careers for the same offense.

Oh that's right, you can't treat the President like everybody else. :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top