Well gents. I understand your disbelief. I too was gobsmacked.
No photo on the internet is necessary to tell me what I saw in person. The glass on the top of the display case in which the revolver was resting, was less than 18" from my nose. The revolver itself may have been another 24" under the glass I was looking through. There was a coiled snake metal gizmo affixed to the wood grip, and the hang tag said "Man with No Name" or "No Name." Barrel looked to be about 7 inches in length. The loading lever looked to have been made of two pieces of tubular steel, joined in the middle.
The starboard side (right side) of the revolver was facing the glass. The rear sight was above the forcing cone on the barrel. There was a loading lever, yes. There also was a loading gate, in the same location as one would find a loading gate on an 1873, on the starboard side in the recoil shield. There was no ejector rod on the side of the barrel, or frame, or anywhere to be found on the starboard side of that revolver. There *may* have been one on the left side of the revolver, but since I didn't actually handle the piece, I don't know. Heck there may have been a second loading gate on the left side of the revolver. I didn't see it. But unless someone tells me that there is a second loading gate and an ejector on the left side of the revolver, I think I'm safe in going forward with the belief that there is none.
If one were to use the loading lever as an ejector, in the customary fashion, by unclipping it from the spud near the muzzle of the barrel, and pivoting it downwards, to push the case out with the short length of cylindrical, cupped, metal customarily used for seating lead balls in a cap and ball revolver, one would have a devil of a time extracting the empty cartridge through the meat of the recoil shield, around the hammer, and internal lockwork of the firearm. Perhaps one removes the barrel wedge and pulls the barrel and somehow turns it about on its axis to use the loading lever to push empties out. Seems a whole lot of work to accomplish what could be much more easily achieved using a small stick in the field.
Perhaps the loading lever, being what looked to be a two part affair, has a telescoping, readily removable, pin or something in it. Perhaps one unclips the lever, pulls the telescoping pin out of the lever, and uses it by hand to individually push the empties out. I would be concerned that the loading lever in its arced descent would enter the chambers and lock the mechanism as one probed with the pin to push out an empty.
All I know is I'm glad I didn't buy one sight unseen. They didn't have any "conversion" models, which I haven't seen in person, but which I have seen photos of at Taylors and Company website. They quite obviously have an ejector assembly affixed to the barrel in line with the loading gate on the starboard side of the barrel.
Nothing wrong with that model though and a number of folks like 'em a lot.
An interesting study in "marketing" and what was going on.