Okay guys two observations. One, he is gay. Most gay men subscribe to the liberal point of view and he would, therefore, be expected to be anti-gun. Two, he uses the technological restriction on the 2nd Amendment. As we know from court decisions, if you apply an interpretaion to one Amendment then the interpretation is applied to all. If the 2nd means muzzleloaders bacause the founding fathers could not have foreseen the AR-15, then you must agree that the 1st Amendment does not apply to TV, radio, the internet, or for that matter anything written with a typewriter or ball point pen. We all know that freedom of speech DOES apply to those forms of media and the Constitution is not to be interpreted as technologically restricted. Sounds to me like his source for info is Rosie O'Donnell, that was the arguement she used on Tom Selleck. The guy really isn't that bright for trying to use THAT poor an arguement. I am just waiting for him to try the 'militia is the National Guard' when the Supreme Court ruled in 1990 that the term 'people' as used in the Constitution is refering to the individual not the collective right. I want a public gun control debate with this bozo, he has no idea what he is talking about.