From the San Antonio Express-News 2-7-99 Pg G1:
QUOTE
It's time to elect a world leader, and your vote counts. Here's the scoop on the three leading candidates:
Candidate A: associates with ward heelers and consults with astrologists. He's had two mistresses. He chain-smokes and drinks eight to 10 martinis a day.
Candidate B: was kicked out of office twice, sleeps until noon, used opium in college and drinks a quart of brandy very evening.
Candidate C: is a decorated war hero. He's a vegetarian, doesn't smoke, drinks an occasional beer and hasn't had any illicit affairs
Which of these is your choice?
Candidate A is Franklin Roosevelt.
Candidate B is Winston Churchill
Candidate C is Adolf Hitler.
UNQUOTE
Carefully selected facts can serve any desired purpose.
HCI publishes crap and we must respond. They are proactive, we are reactive. This is the path to compromise (at best) and defeat.
How can we put "them" on the defensive?
QUOTE
It's time to elect a world leader, and your vote counts. Here's the scoop on the three leading candidates:
Candidate A: associates with ward heelers and consults with astrologists. He's had two mistresses. He chain-smokes and drinks eight to 10 martinis a day.
Candidate B: was kicked out of office twice, sleeps until noon, used opium in college and drinks a quart of brandy very evening.
Candidate C: is a decorated war hero. He's a vegetarian, doesn't smoke, drinks an occasional beer and hasn't had any illicit affairs
Which of these is your choice?
Candidate A is Franklin Roosevelt.
Candidate B is Winston Churchill
Candidate C is Adolf Hitler.
UNQUOTE
Carefully selected facts can serve any desired purpose.
HCI publishes crap and we must respond. They are proactive, we are reactive. This is the path to compromise (at best) and defeat.
How can we put "them" on the defensive?