Dallas Jack
New member
I have my scope mounted and sighted in for 100 yds. For some reason I decided to see how much adjustment I had and where in the adjustment range I was. Anyway I mounted a stud type (with grid) boresighter in the muzzle and noted where on the grid the recticle was. I then turned the elevation and windage to each extreme and noted the position on the grid.
I found I had 36 inches of travel for each. I then adjusted both windage and elevation 18 inches from the extreme (should put the reticle in the center) and noted the position on the grid. Well I compared the position with what I had noted when I started and I was back to the same grid I had started at. This means my reticle was centered when the gun was sighted in. Accually I looked at the turrets (turrets had been set to 0 when the gun was sighted in at 100 yards) and I was off by 1 inch in elevation an 3/4 inch in windage. The grid is 1=4" at 100 yards so the difference was my not being able to split the grid closer. But close enough.
Anyway I used the mirror method as a check (hold a mirror up to the objective and adjust your reticle to match the reflection.) and It was way off. Just for a check I adjusted the elevation to match with the mirror and ended with very little up adjustment. Something like 4 inches.
I have read in several places, probaly on different sites to use this method instead of counting clicks to recenter a recicle.
Now for my question. Why did the two give different results? I know the first method using the grid is correct. I counted the movement accross the grid. Is there something wrong with the way I am using the mirror? Any ideas?
Dallas Jack
I found I had 36 inches of travel for each. I then adjusted both windage and elevation 18 inches from the extreme (should put the reticle in the center) and noted the position on the grid. Well I compared the position with what I had noted when I started and I was back to the same grid I had started at. This means my reticle was centered when the gun was sighted in. Accually I looked at the turrets (turrets had been set to 0 when the gun was sighted in at 100 yards) and I was off by 1 inch in elevation an 3/4 inch in windage. The grid is 1=4" at 100 yards so the difference was my not being able to split the grid closer. But close enough.
Anyway I used the mirror method as a check (hold a mirror up to the objective and adjust your reticle to match the reflection.) and It was way off. Just for a check I adjusted the elevation to match with the mirror and ended with very little up adjustment. Something like 4 inches.
I have read in several places, probaly on different sites to use this method instead of counting clicks to recenter a recicle.
Now for my question. Why did the two give different results? I know the first method using the grid is correct. I counted the movement accross the grid. Is there something wrong with the way I am using the mirror? Any ideas?
Dallas Jack