I had a Glock 33, and I liked it a heckuva lot. I shot it a heckuva lot, too.
For me, though, it was difficult for IWB concealment, cos it was so darn chunky. It's small, but it's fat! Because the gun was so small in length and height, it looked like a tumor. Or a colostomy bag. I actually think the slightly larger Glock 32 would have concealed better!
Worked good, though.
I'd be tempted to go with the 239 next time, but who knows? I like the Glock's extra capacity and its non-DA/SA trigger a lot. I also think they recover from recoil better (plastic frame gives?). I think the 239 might be easier to conceal (for me) because it's flatter, but it ain't that small.
One thing about the Glocks, though, is that polygonal "rifling" gives them more velocity in a given barrel length. If you check around, you'll see that anyone who's tested Sig v. Glock shows the Glocks are faster with any given load out of the same bbl length. Since you're talking pretty puny barrels in the miniguns, you might want the polygonal rifling to get the advantage of the .357 Sig's speed. W/O the velocity, the .357 Sig is just an overpriced 9x19 with lower capacity and a lot more muzzle blast.
With the advantage of its velocity, however, it's a great round (that always feeds!).
