I, too, agree that the reporter wasn't knowledgable about the topic, and definately wasn't on our side.
All in all, the tone of the report was the same ol' anti-gun BS - "Guns kill people. Guns are bad. We need to reform our gun laws. We need to take guns away. Blahblahblah". Notice all the shots of EMS, people running for their lives and SWAT activity? Meant to inspire fear and hysteria. She didn't ask any questions of real importance, only crap like "when will it be available?". Things she could have asked?
How does it work?
Does it use some sort of radio signal?
Can outside interference block the signal, preventing the gun from firing?
If a criminal steals this gun, can the "smart chip" be deactivated (ala converting semi-auto to full-auto)?
Can someone make their own wristband that emits radio frequencies, fooling the gun into thinking that it's the owner who's firing it?
If the gun fails to fire, is the manufacturer held legally responsible? *laugh*
Are the police/security guards/armed forces/secret service going to be issued "smart guns"? (hell no)
Etc, etc, etc.
What really upset me is when the head honcho from Smith & Wesson was talking about their efforts to develop and market a "smart gun" of their own. First Colt bowing to lawyer/government pressure, now Smith & Wesson? What's going to happen with the only kind of gun you can buy is a "smart gun"? Personally, I sure as hell don't want to bet my life on a "smart gun" or microchip. The Windows(tm) computers we are forced to use here at work crash far too often...
Oh, and did anyone else notice that the trigger pull seemed a little too long for her when she tried to shoot it?