If you are new to reloading, if you research information on Microsoft's "Bing" A.I. (or perhaps any such system), be sure to continue to research that supports what you are told.
I have encountered errors on A.I. in medical information and I just encountered one in reloading. I asked for a comparative burn rate between H870 and US869.
The reply I got said H870 is 146 and US869 is 173, so US869 is slower than H870.
The problem is this data was extracted from 2 different burn rate tables. One had a total number of 173 powders and H870 is not listed (because it is no longer available) On that table, US869 is 173.
The other table used has a total of 150 powders and H870 IS listed as 146.
Interestingly enough, US869 is also on the 150 table and it is 149. So it IS slower than H870 at 146.
Why AI didn't just report the 150 table is beyond me. But you simply cannot use the comparison AI gave at all. It is completely a useless reply.
I have encountered errors on A.I. in medical information and I just encountered one in reloading. I asked for a comparative burn rate between H870 and US869.
The reply I got said H870 is 146 and US869 is 173, so US869 is slower than H870.
The problem is this data was extracted from 2 different burn rate tables. One had a total number of 173 powders and H870 is not listed (because it is no longer available) On that table, US869 is 173.
The other table used has a total of 150 powders and H870 IS listed as 146.
Interestingly enough, US869 is also on the 150 table and it is 149. So it IS slower than H870 at 146.
Why AI didn't just report the 150 table is beyond me. But you simply cannot use the comparison AI gave at all. It is completely a useless reply.