Hello,
I plan on purchasing a new "loaded" M1A from S/A. Does anybody have a good idea which barrel steel (stainless or carbon [chrome-moly?]) will give the longer
service life? I have numerous stainless revolvers and am fully aware of the rust preventive advantages of stainless. However, this rifle will be kept clean and not
exposed to the elements in the way a hunting arm might. Unfortunately, I've read differing opinions in the past on whether a stainless or carbon barrel would
stand up better to a large number of rounds fired and repeated cleanings (probably due to the varying qualities of stainless over the years). The previous
consensus was that chrome-moly stood up slightly better to throat erosion, etc. I'm not sure if newer stainless barrels are now superior in that regard.
So given a rifle that will probably have a high number of rounds fired and cleaned carefully (using bore-guides, etc.), which steel is a better choice for long barrel
life?
Any input is appreciated.
Thanks,
Todd
I plan on purchasing a new "loaded" M1A from S/A. Does anybody have a good idea which barrel steel (stainless or carbon [chrome-moly?]) will give the longer
service life? I have numerous stainless revolvers and am fully aware of the rust preventive advantages of stainless. However, this rifle will be kept clean and not
exposed to the elements in the way a hunting arm might. Unfortunately, I've read differing opinions in the past on whether a stainless or carbon barrel would
stand up better to a large number of rounds fired and repeated cleanings (probably due to the varying qualities of stainless over the years). The previous
consensus was that chrome-moly stood up slightly better to throat erosion, etc. I'm not sure if newer stainless barrels are now superior in that regard.
So given a rifle that will probably have a high number of rounds fired and cleaned carefully (using bore-guides, etc.), which steel is a better choice for long barrel
life?
Any input is appreciated.
Thanks,
Todd