Canadian Gun registry is millions over budget

Oatka

New member
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/

Gun registry is millions over budget

Government admits massive cost overruns;
'This turkey cannot be made to fly'
Tim Naumetz
The Ottawa Citizen

The new federal firearms registry has cost taxpayers $327 million so far and is running up a yearly bill nearly 10 times higher than what the government forecast in 1995.

Despite the cost -- and with more than 1,000 police officers and bureaucrats working for the registry -- critics say it is unlikely the government will meet its Jan. 1, 2001, deadline for licensing all gun owners.

Even the Canadian Firearms Centre admits that as of February, only 142,324 new licences had been issued to gun owners across Canada since the registry started in December 1998. A further 270,000 valid licences remained from the previous gun-control regime.

The centre estimates there are 1.6 million gun owners to be licensed by the end of the year, with the backlog of applications already up to 45,000.

"What will it take for them to realize that this turkey cannot be made to fly?" asked Dave Tomlinson, Edmonton-based president of the National Firearms Association. "It's a complete waste of money because there is no way on earth to keep a registration system accurate."

The Canadian Firearms Centre this week released to the Citizen the cumulative cost of the system up to March 31. The figure confirmed the fears of Canadian Alliance MP Garry Breitkreuz, a staunch foe of the Firearms Act, that the cost of the national registry will exceed the forecast that former justice minister Allan Rock made in 1995.

Mr. Rock then estimated a five-year price tag of $185 million, including a one-time startup cost of $85 million.

The government spent $45 million before the registry began, Jean Valin, head of public affairs for the Firearms Centre, said yesterday.

"There was some relatively small amounts that were spent in the early years in preparations, consultations, design sessions, consultations with groups," he said.

By the end of March 1999, only four months into the registry, the federal government had spent another $82 million, according to figures released by Mr. Valin. The government spent a further $200 million on the registry in the past 12 months.

Mr. Rock's 1995 estimate, based on the cost of the previous gun-control system, put the average yearly cost of the new registry at about $20 million.

Mr. Valin said the cost of the system will decrease once all gun owners and their weapons are licensed and registered. "As you load up three million people and seven million guns, you're going to incur extra operating costs that won't be there after," he said.

Gun owners have until Jan. 1, 2003, to register all their firearms.

The number of gun owners and the total number of firearms in Canada is under dispute.

Based on international averages and past Canadian records, the National Firearms Association estimates 6.5 million gun owners and 20 million firearms. The government estimates three million gun owners and up to seven million firearms.

Mr. Tomlinson said the Justice Department continues to underestimate the number of firearms owners to make the federal registry appear successful once the registration deadlines pass.



------------------
The New World Order has a Third Reich odor.
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Mr. Tomlinson said the Justice Department continues to underestimate the number of firearms owners to make the federal registry appear successful once the registration deadlines pass.[/quote]
That's cute. So, by underestimating the numbers of gunowners and guns, when the deadline for completion of the registration arrives and they have completely failed to register ALL guns, they can claim success anyway, based on the number they estimated compared to the number they registered ... without regard to the actual number of guns in Canada. Do I get this right?

So, what's the point? To get the system in place and started? Oh yeah. All those unlicensed gunowners will be ... can I say it ? ... FELONS! It couldn't possibly be a misdemeanor could it?

[This message has been edited by sensop (edited April 20, 2000).]
 
OK, I must be doing my math wrong. $327 Million dollars buys 142,324 new licenses... $2297.57 per license? Do I have that right?
 
Lets see...
Here in Aus we had imported 2.5 million SKS rifles & 220,000 were handed in during the buyback.

Worked for us !
wink.gif


------------------
"The Gun from Down Under !"
http://www.para1911fanclub.w3.to/
E-mail hotshot_2000@hotmail.com
Alternate E-mail
HS2000@ausi.com
 
Looking at the thing another way, one might observe as follows: HERE ONE SEES THEIR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK.
 
2.5 million SKSs? Are you sure you didn't shift a decimal place or something?

There are < 19 million people, does every second household have an SKS?

(Then again, I'm from oz and I think my Dad had a couple
smile.gif
)

I actually don't like things like this being over budget. The artificial "costs to society of gun ownership" will either be passed on to "those who are costing us for all this" (gunowners) or used as argument for total prohibition.


Battler.
 
Back
Top