I would think not. UNLESS you could prove a negligent disregard for the concern of your life, or a direct family members. Such as;
<UL TYPE=SQUARE>
<LI> Direct life threats to you, or family members.
<LI> You, or direct family member were the subject of a known dangerous stalker.
<LI> You, or a family member, were the repeated victim of violent abuse.
</UL>
And only after any and all of this might have occured could you show contempt, or disregard for your well-being, by disallowing you to protect yourself with deadly force.
But, this exact same scenarion has occured in this country, because of the same refusal of LEO agencies to issue CCW to those who desperately needed it. Only after the fact was it known how urgently the CCW was needed.
I would think it would be possible for a competent attorney to build a case in this direction. Perhaps this is what's necessary to force the respective LEO's to issue CCW's. Rather to mandate States to force County Sheriff's to comply with State Laws.
------------------
The most foolish mistake we could make would be to allow the subjected people to carry arms; history shows that all conquerers who have allowed their subjected people to carry arms have prepared their own fall.
Adolf Hitler