Gunners,
I am going on a deer/hog/black bear hunt in NC next year.
The shots will likely be 100 yds. and under.
I am taking my Ruger SBH for the hogs and will try to get the outfitter to put me in a archery stand so my shots should be about 50 yards and less. the .44 has an ultra dot sighted in to 50 yds.
For the deer and bear, my question is this I have a Marlin 336 in .35 Rem with a 4X scope and a Remington 7600 in 30.06 with a 3 to 10X scope.
The Marlin is my favorite and first rifle ever owned by me and I prefer it because it is a carbine and lighter more handy than the 30.06.
I was just wondering at 100 yards or less, just how much more will the .06 outperform the .35 and is it enough to supersede the Marlin?
Also, the 30.06 is more accurate, but at that range I think that won't be a factor.
Rmocarsky
I am going on a deer/hog/black bear hunt in NC next year.
The shots will likely be 100 yds. and under.
I am taking my Ruger SBH for the hogs and will try to get the outfitter to put me in a archery stand so my shots should be about 50 yards and less. the .44 has an ultra dot sighted in to 50 yds.
For the deer and bear, my question is this I have a Marlin 336 in .35 Rem with a 4X scope and a Remington 7600 in 30.06 with a 3 to 10X scope.
The Marlin is my favorite and first rifle ever owned by me and I prefer it because it is a carbine and lighter more handy than the 30.06.
I was just wondering at 100 yards or less, just how much more will the .06 outperform the .35 and is it enough to supersede the Marlin?
Also, the 30.06 is more accurate, but at that range I think that won't be a factor.
Rmocarsky