dakota.potts
New member
Hey all,
Started looking into the CZ P-01 (or potentially the PCR) as likely my next handgun as something a little smaller and lighter than my full size CZ for ease of carry. As a budding gunsmith and a CZ fan, I have of course thought about ways to make the gun more "mine" starting with new grips and maybe night sights.
Due to the somewhat long CZ double action pull (being a fan of decockers versus manual safeties myself) I've of course also looked at some of the kits on the market. Cajun Gun Works makes a number of kits to reduce length of travel, creep, reset, pull weight etc. Naturally a nicer trigger (light but not too light, smooth pull, short reset, no slap) is something all of us as shooters desire. I wonder though if this can contribute to a loss of reliability. The CZ P-01 is sold as having incredible reliability being sufficient to go well beyond NATO standards for rounds between failure. All of the surfaces and shapes have been of course engineered by CZ's team to meet this reliability while minimizing cost. I have to wonder if messing with springs, sears, hammers, etc. could in any way throw off internal geometry to the point where you would experience a loss of reliability. On a carry gun intended to last for the indefinite future with only normal parts being swapped out as necessary, this would be less than ideal.
Anybody have any insight in this arena?
Started looking into the CZ P-01 (or potentially the PCR) as likely my next handgun as something a little smaller and lighter than my full size CZ for ease of carry. As a budding gunsmith and a CZ fan, I have of course thought about ways to make the gun more "mine" starting with new grips and maybe night sights.
Due to the somewhat long CZ double action pull (being a fan of decockers versus manual safeties myself) I've of course also looked at some of the kits on the market. Cajun Gun Works makes a number of kits to reduce length of travel, creep, reset, pull weight etc. Naturally a nicer trigger (light but not too light, smooth pull, short reset, no slap) is something all of us as shooters desire. I wonder though if this can contribute to a loss of reliability. The CZ P-01 is sold as having incredible reliability being sufficient to go well beyond NATO standards for rounds between failure. All of the surfaces and shapes have been of course engineered by CZ's team to meet this reliability while minimizing cost. I have to wonder if messing with springs, sears, hammers, etc. could in any way throw off internal geometry to the point where you would experience a loss of reliability. On a carry gun intended to last for the indefinite future with only normal parts being swapped out as necessary, this would be less than ideal.
Anybody have any insight in this arena?