Bush? Are you sure?

S

Seronac

New member
In my research I've come across a lot of references that tie the senior former-President George Bush to the U.N and the New World Order, such as:

"Out of these troubled times a new world order ... can emerge... We're now in sight of a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders." - Sept. 11, 1990, to a joint session of Congress

So, What are the chances that the younger George Bush will be that same way - pretty good, I say.

HOWEVER, who else are you going to vote for? In what is essentially a two-party system, a vote for ANYONE ELSE but Bush, is a vote for Gore.

And while George W. Bush might push us toward the New World Order, Al Gore will DEFINITELY SHOVE, PROD, PUSH and PULL us, kicking and screaming, in to the New World Order and the tyrranical, anti-Constitutional, anti-God pseudo-peace of the United Nations.

So, yes, in my opinion, Bush is the man for the job. Just be careful who vote into Congress!
 
This year I'm voting for Chthulu. Why settle for a lesser evil? Anything less than the best would be un-American.

Seriously, a vote for anyone but Bush or Gore is a vote for anyone but Bush or Gore. A vote for Buchanan or Browne etc. would only help Gore if that person otherwise would have voted for Bush. It's just as likely that voter would have otherwise stayed home. Some voters for Browne (or Hegelin) might be ex-Democrats who don't like the Clinton-Gore record on civil liberties, which stinks, or they may be labor-union types who don't like free trade and vote Buchanan.

Of course, we all know that if voting could really change things, it would be illegal.

--The Beez
 
Beez I like that last part.
Will grudingly vote for the Busch Master, oh I mean Bush.

I wonder if all the third party candidates dropped out if the bush bashers would just decide not to vote, or give it to OwlGore?

I see what members here are saying about the evil bush and the nra bashing ect.. etc.. but I still think Jim March has it right that we have to stack the SC in our favor or we will lose it all, I have very little confidence in alomost all other methods. Look at the two justices that we basically have on our side (appointed by the lesser of two evils)
If we can get a few more and pray they won't duck the issue maybe we can prevail. Sorry if it's a bit off topic.

Seronac if you want NWO stuff read "Enroute to global occupation" I think the authorS name is (last) KAH

Seronac you won't get much sympathy for your belief that there is a new world order from most members here, even when our leaders claim there is one. The saying is that it makes us look like wacked out ufo conspriacy theorists which is what the media would portray us as, so they have a point. Also have heard it here that it is just a diversion to keep us from effectivly utilizing our efforts to get our Second Amendment rights restored. I think things like the Port Huron statement that infected us with the liberals we have today is a small example of what the world parliment association and others want to do on a grand scale.

I personally think after doing some of my own research that there are efforts to unite the world under one "super reich". I am uncertain how far and organized this effort is at this time but I believe it it defineitly out there.


[This message has been edited by oberkommando (edited August 02, 2000).]
 
Well, if Cthulhu can't run, how about The Ghoul Formerly Known As Pickman? ;)

To answer Oberkommando's question, "I wonder if all the third party candidates dropped out if the bush bashers would just decide not to vote, or give it to OwlGore," I don't know, and I can't speak for all of us "Bush-bashers." I would probably write in Ron Paul.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top