I have noted from reviewing my reloading data from past 14 years that there seems to be an patern between bullet style and accuracy. By this, I mean that certain bullet style/weights are easier to develop accurate loads than others. In the calibers that I reload I noticed that following bullet styles seems to be better than others:
9mm - 124-125gr JHP (worst is 115gr FMJ)
38 Special - 148 gr Wadcutters and 158gr SWC lead (worst is any Lead RN design)
357 Mag - 158gr JHP (worst is any 110-125gr bullets)
44 Mag - 260-320gr SWC lead GC (worst is any bullets under 200gr)
45ACP - 230gr JHP and 200gr SWC (worst is 230gr RN lead followed by 230gr FMJ)
In general I have found that for pistols RN lead or FMJ bullets and any "light weight" bullets for revolvers require much more work to find accurate loads. Please note that I'm talking about accuracy only.
Also with 22lr ammo I noticed that solid round nose bullets seem much more accurate than HP or solid truncated style.
Anybody else have similar experience?
9mm - 124-125gr JHP (worst is 115gr FMJ)
38 Special - 148 gr Wadcutters and 158gr SWC lead (worst is any Lead RN design)
357 Mag - 158gr JHP (worst is any 110-125gr bullets)
44 Mag - 260-320gr SWC lead GC (worst is any bullets under 200gr)
45ACP - 230gr JHP and 200gr SWC (worst is 230gr RN lead followed by 230gr FMJ)
In general I have found that for pistols RN lead or FMJ bullets and any "light weight" bullets for revolvers require much more work to find accurate loads. Please note that I'm talking about accuracy only.
Also with 22lr ammo I noticed that solid round nose bullets seem much more accurate than HP or solid truncated style.
Anybody else have similar experience?