This is a tough one. I started the Buchanan/Bush thread a while back and the topic STILL is not resolved. No doubt about it...Pat is THE NO compromise pro-gun, pro-life, pro-consitution, pro-trade (traditional American that is), pro-American sovernty, pro-liberty, anti-NAFTA, anti-GATT, anti-UN, anti-tax/spend candidate running. The ONLY one who I think compares favorably to Pat B. is that black republican that the party doesn't want either....what's his name...you know, the guy who was illegally detained, transported and left in a bad neighborhood by a LEO when he went to debate before the last elections...you know, the guy who was embassador to the United Nations, but thinks that we should get out of it. No it wasn't Al Sharpten or Jesse Jackson. Not Michael Jackson either. The powers that be (ie. media, corporate sponsers, and party big wigs), won't even allow his name to be heard enough to be known by many of us in this pro-gun forum. Do you all know who the mystery man is? Do the powers that be REALY care about a minority in office like they would like us to think? They show thier true colors when it comes to a candidate like Pat B. or ____?...Thier colors are red IMHO. They like to call themselves liberals. Some call themselves fiscal conservatives too.
IMHO the Republican candidate that the Republicans chose the last two times around lost. We can't blame it on Mr. Perot or anyone else. They lost because of a lack of principle and because they ran a lousey campagn. Other than that the majority of American voters who chose to vote, voted for Mr. Clinton. Those who did, got what they asked for. Lets face it. We live in a corrupt society. A society that is reflected by the leaders that it chooses.
------------------
"But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip; and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." -Jesus Christ (Luke 22:36, see John 3:15-18)