Browning Buckmark-Buy it?

glockorama

New member
I did a search on buckmarks, but I wanted some fresh feedback. I'm thinking of spending my tax refund on a .22. I have owned several rugers and would like to try something different. I have handled some buckmarks and like the way they feel. My local shop has a really pretty blued, 5" barrelled (slab sided), with a nice gold trigger. I would say the trigger broke at about 3lbs. It was $225. Thoughts and feedback?
 
I'm not an expert on Buckmark models or pricing, but I have shot a friend's Buckmark Camper (low end model) quite a bit and I like it a lot. I plan to get a Buckmark myself. I'd say get it.

Doug
 
I have the 5" slabside model. It is very accurate and reliable. The rear sight is held on by 2 screws. The one farthest back has a tendency to loosen up after a couple a hundred rounds. I just take an allen wrench and tighten it up and its ready to go. I like it alot.
 
Yeah, go for it.

I've made the same decision; different logic. Checked around, did some research, and finally decided on a nickel target. Guess what? DON'T make it anymore! Now, its I don't know which one I'll get; but no doubt a buckmark. Good luck.
 
i like the ruger because it feels like a real(full sized) gun.all metal construction.not sure but the browning looks lighter and maby more plastic then steel?
 
I have a Buckmark Silohette (sp?). Shoots and handles like a dream. Comes with standard issue loose screw on sight mounts.

Keep it clean and you'll never regret springing for it.
 
I've owned a buckmark for 8 years now
and its been trouble free.I like the way
it feels in my hand,accurate with
different loads and is all steel.:cool:
 
Stick with the Ruger---the Buckmark is an inferior design-the screws on the aluminum strap on the top--Always backed out---carrying a hex wrench around all the time is a hassle----get a Ruger and you don't have those problems. And NO---the Buckmark is not all steel---the barrel/slide assembly is steel but the frame its self is made from aluminum.
 
The Buckmark is a fine entry level target .22. I have one and love it. I've put thousands of rounds through it with no problem, although mine is a bit unreliable if I don't clean it after 200 rounds or so.

If and when I get another .22 semi, though, I will try to find one that is easier to field strip. It's a minor, though irritating, annoyance to have to hunt for the little recoil pad or one of the lock washers if they skitter off the table while you're cleaning. I won't buy a Ruger for political reasons, but might check out the Sig Trailside target models.
 
$225.00 sounds more than reasonable for what sounds to be the Standard Model. Is this new or used? The reason I ask, is that Standard models around here usually run about $25.00 nore. I paid around $300 out the door for my Buckmark Plus last December. The Plus is pretty much just a Standard with better grips. Buckmarks are good shooters. Not as durable as a Ruger, but very accurate and comfortable to shoot. The open design of the reciever makes cleaning it easier than cleaning a Ruger. Just be careful of the little pieces parts under the right side grip, and take extra double care not to crossthread or strip the hex screws. The only other area of concern is the tiny recoil retaining clip. Get extras. Like all Brownings I've owned, fit finish and workmanship are top notch.

This part is unconfirmed. I heard a rumor that Browning had problems filling the original contract of Buckmarks and had to get barrels from a custom barrel maker ( I forget the name), way back when they first came out. The early Buckmarks established a reputation for extreme accuracy. Take this info with a grain of salt though. Mine are all more recent vintage and accuracy, while ver, very, very good, isn't any more so than most of my other .22's with the exception of my High Standard.
 
Aside from the fact that the hex screws that hold the rear sight have a tendencey to loosen, the gun is solid and shoots well. I got mine because the price was right. local store was having a sale $180 out the door, couldn't be passed on.
 
I have a Buckmark slab side and a Ruger Mark II. I'll take the Buckmark over the Ruger any day. I have fired thousands of rounds through my slabside and have NEVER had the sight screws even get lose. It is accurate as hell and easier to strip and clean than the Ruger, in my humble opinion:)
 
I would agree w/ ninefingers - I have a Buckmark Micro 5.5 - nice, solid pistol, better sights (IMO) than the rugers (finer adjustments on mine), feeds everything I have ever given it. Yeah, takedown is not something you would want to do on the trail, but I can just run a brush down the bore & wipe the slide (as well as i can get to it), and it seems to do fine - hundreds of rounds w/o any problems. Much more accurate than I am, and just feels nicer than the Rugers I have tried. I also have never had any problems w/ loosened screws - stays put very well.
 
rugerfreak
you are correct,part steel,part
aluminum.But there's no way the browning
buckmark is inferior design compared to
the ruger:rolleyes:
 
FWIW, the smallest goups I ever saw from a guy shooting offhand were from a NIB Browning Buckmark.

I saw the groups (lane next to me), commented, and they told me he had just picked up the Buckmark.

Quite an endorsement, from my point of view.
 
I. LOVE. MY. BUCKMARK.


For practicing the basics, or teaching a newbie how to shoot, there is no better than an out-of-the-box Buckmark with standard adjustable iron sights, 6" barrel, and the original-style hard flat stocks. If you're only offered the target-style, try to find a pair of the original flat stocks. They're comfortable, and smaller shooters handle them easier.

Buy it. Buy two.
 
Back
Top