I saw the interveiw and came to a conclusion based on what Bradley said about his stand on gun confiscation.
The most logical thing we should do is to vote for Al Gore. You ask WHY?
1. I think we can conclude that he is the lesser of the two evils. Bradley sounds like he will enact executive powers to disarm us all while the judicial and legislative branches enforce them; all the way from those cops to congressmen who abuse power/authority. I do not believe that Gore will go for total disarmament. He will only give us gun registration, gun owner registration, and outlaw "assult" weapons, while making most law abiding Amerikans get govt permission to carry the means to defend themselves. I think that gun owners will live with this until we can elect a good conservative like Mr. Bush, who is for..............................
2. Gore seems to be the most electable since he is both a democrat and is VP. If even half of the 80 million gun owners in US of A get behind him, we can keep Bradley from winning and doing something evil, like getting permission in order to buy what the elite govt can use against us after looking over the list, checking it twice, gonna find out whos got what at what price....Mr. gunowners going down town....La-la-la-la.
Why throw your vote away on a truly pro-gun candidate like Ambassador Alan Keyes or Pat Buchanan? A vote for them is a vote for Bradley. They just aren't "viable".
We all know that Gore is for gun control, albeit less than Bradley. Until we come up with a better option that is truely progun and will work, I think we should just hold our noses this time, rally around Gore and support him. If he sees where his bread and butter is comming from, (ie. gun owners), he's bound to sit up straight and listen when hes elected.
Robert
------------------
"But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip; and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one." -Jesus Christ (Luke 22:36, see John 3:15-18)