Both fingers on the trigger= tighter pattern... good or bad?
- Thread starter TXAZ
- Start date
EricReynolds
New member
Doesn't seem right to me, but whether or not it's even a good idea, I don't see how it's even possible unless you have very petite hands and fingers.
stephen426
New member
Sorry to say but it makes no sense to me either. The only thing I can think of is that you are cancelling out the effect of push or pull with your finger. By that, I mean it reduces the effect of pulling the trigger with the wrong part of your finger. If you pull with the very tip, you tend to "push" your shots. If you put your finger in too far, you "pull" your shots. Try making sure you pull the trigger with just the pad of your index finger.
I guess the worst possible thing that can happen is developing bad habits. Most people will react the way they practice. Pulling the trigger with both fingers is not practical at all.
Do some searches on how to properly grip the gun. The fingers of the support hand usually wraps around the front the hand your gun is in. The support hand thumb is usually either sticking up or laid on top of your other hand. Your gun hand should be pushing slightly forward and your support hand should be pulling slightly back. Do NOT death grip your gun as this will hurt accuracy.
I guess the worst possible thing that can happen is developing bad habits. Most people will react the way they practice. Pulling the trigger with both fingers is not practical at all.
Do some searches on how to properly grip the gun. The fingers of the support hand usually wraps around the front the hand your gun is in. The support hand thumb is usually either sticking up or laid on top of your other hand. Your gun hand should be pushing slightly forward and your support hand should be pulling slightly back. Do NOT death grip your gun as this will hurt accuracy.
There is obviously something wrong with your trigger pull.
If the only reason you shoot is for target purposes, you should fix it.
If the only reason you shoot is self defence, too many things could go wrong while you are trying to stuff your second finger into the trigger guard, so you should fix it.
I just can't see any good reason to shoot with 2 fingers on the trigger.
If the only reason you shoot is for target purposes, you should fix it.
If the only reason you shoot is self defence, too many things could go wrong while you are trying to stuff your second finger into the trigger guard, so you should fix it.
I just can't see any good reason to shoot with 2 fingers on the trigger.
Interesting
TXAZ
I once had to train a very petite Indian girl, her Dad owned a Security Company in Ontario Canada, she only worked in the Office, but had access to the revolvers, she booked them in and out.
Guns, S&W .38 Spl. double action only, had been made that way by a good Gun Smith. A 9 lb pull? Smooth as glass. She could not pull the trigger with one finger, did great with two, all shooting was two hands. She could not have been licensed, but fine for use, in house, so to speak.
Your Sig is double action first shot (Jeff Cooper said that was a perfect answer to a non existent problem) if you want to do that, two fingers, it's your gun, you have heard the good advice (read) fill your boots.
TXAZ
I once had to train a very petite Indian girl, her Dad owned a Security Company in Ontario Canada, she only worked in the Office, but had access to the revolvers, she booked them in and out.
Guns, S&W .38 Spl. double action only, had been made that way by a good Gun Smith. A 9 lb pull? Smooth as glass. She could not pull the trigger with one finger, did great with two, all shooting was two hands. She could not have been licensed, but fine for use, in house, so to speak.
Your Sig is double action first shot (Jeff Cooper said that was a perfect answer to a non existent problem) if you want to do that, two fingers, it's your gun, you have heard the good advice (read) fill your boots.
leadcounsel
Moderator
Bad idea and bad habit to form.
That would be like using two feet to drive, breaking and gas.
Reasons to us 1 dedicated finger
1) Some pistols, and all rifles, won't allow you to use 2 fingers
2) In stressful situations, fitting a second finger on top of the first takes more time and may unintentionally fire the weapon.
3) Brain works best sending orders to fewer muscles and adding another trigger finger in the mix could cause for confusion. Remember that in stressful times, fine motor skills deminish. Best to keep one designated finger for training.
That would be like using two feet to drive, breaking and gas.
Reasons to us 1 dedicated finger
1) Some pistols, and all rifles, won't allow you to use 2 fingers
2) In stressful situations, fitting a second finger on top of the first takes more time and may unintentionally fire the weapon.
3) Brain works best sending orders to fewer muscles and adding another trigger finger in the mix could cause for confusion. Remember that in stressful times, fine motor skills deminish. Best to keep one designated finger for training.
It's an acceptable but not ideal method for getting arthritic, frail little old ladies up and shooting with the inappropriate heavy-trigger hard-kicking lightweight snubbies people always shove into their hands.
Other than that, notsomuch. Either build up your strength so you're able to manipulate the trigger with your trigger finger, or purchase a firearm with a trigger better suited to your strength.
pax
Other than that, notsomuch. Either build up your strength so you're able to manipulate the trigger with your trigger finger, or purchase a firearm with a trigger better suited to your strength.
pax
Double Naught Spy
New member
When people suggest or mandate a course of action but cannot give a reason why it should be followed, then there is reason to question the validity of what they want you to do. They may be correct, or not, and the fact that they can't explain to you why you should choose a particular course of action indicates that they may not fully understand what they are talking about.
I see target shooters do a lot of stuff I consider weird and they shoot very well. A lot of what I have seen does not transfer well to situations outside of target shooting, such as to self defense shooting. If you are only target shooting and it poses no safety problems while at the same time making your shots better, then I see no problem. People will give you grief for it, however.
No, it would be nothing like using two feet to drive. In using two feet to drive, the feet often need to be doing different tasks on different pedals, and those tasks are sometimes being accomplished simultaneously and at other times being accomplished asynchronously, though many racecar drivers drive in this manner and do so quite successfully. In fact, it is necessary to get the best performance out of their cars by driving in this manner. By contrast, when using two opposing fingers to pull the trigger, the fingers are performing the same task on the same mechanism at the same time in a mirror fashion.
Okay, explain. How is it that the brain is working better sending orders to fewer muscles and is the difference significant?
Given that sympathic reflex often results in one hand mirroring the actions of the other, such as with squeezing actions under stress, I don't see how sending the same signal to both fingers to pull the trigger is going to be a problem.
So is it easier to stand balanced on one foot using half the muscles and supposedly allowing the brain to work best or is it best to stand balanced on two feet, using twice as many muscles and taxing the brain so much more?
I know a lot of shooters find it much easier to shoot well using a twohanded grip on their guns instead of onehanded. Controlling double the muscles does not seem to be a detriment to them at all.
Right, and because fine motor skills diminish, the fine balance of trigger pull/squeeze/depression being performed assymetrically by one finger is going to be much more difficult to keep balanced under stress given that the balanced pull is being attempted through an asymmetric process of using one finger on one side. The balance is more easily controlled when the input to move the trigger is symmetrical. And that is likely why TXAZ's groups are tighter when he is using opposing fingers simultaneously to pull the trigger. Balance is more easily attained through bilateral symmetric action than by unilateral assymetric action.
Right. Most guns are not designed in such a manner to allow for sufficient room inside the trigger guard for more than one finger with sufficient extra space for proper motion and placement. The more things stuffed inside the trigger guard, the more likely the trigger will be depressed unintentionally. This will be especially apparent in winter when you have on gloves.
The problem of trying to fit multiple fingers inside the trigger guard can become even more problematic if you are needing to use your offhand to perform other tasks and transitioning between gripping your gun with the finger inside the trigger guard and doing things like opening doors, fending off blows, doing magazine changes and the like.
Using multiple fingers can be advantageous in certain circumstances but does add a level of complexity to the issue that has the potential to affect safety.
Good post Double OO,
In my case the young lady in question could not pull the trigger with one finger, at all, period. And her finger was not on top of the other one, they were one above the other, the double action Smith gave you that ability.
You had to see these hands to understand, in asking her, in a normal handshake mode, to squeeze my hand just as tight as she could, Wow, like a wee kittens grip.
In my case the young lady in question could not pull the trigger with one finger, at all, period. And her finger was not on top of the other one, they were one above the other, the double action Smith gave you that ability.
You had to see these hands to understand, in asking her, in a normal handshake mode, to squeeze my hand just as tight as she could, Wow, like a wee kittens grip.
two fingered trigger pull
I did some plinking with a .22 handgun as a kid. I never was very good and had no idea of how to do it correctly. I recently purchased a new pistol and revolver. I've been careful to learn proper technique; grip, stance, target acquisition, sight picture, etc. I am not a great shot, but I have made real progress. Knowing how to do it right, and doing it that way every time is my goal. When I first started fishing with a baitcast reel I had to deliberately focus on every part of the cast to get it right. Now after years of doing it, I just focus on the spot I want to hit. I want shooting to be the same way. So what's your point you might ask.
My point is good technique makes for good results. There are always exceptions. One look at Jim Furyk's golf swing will prove that you can do well even if you don't do it "right", but most of us mere mortals need every advantage we can get.
I did some plinking with a .22 handgun as a kid. I never was very good and had no idea of how to do it correctly. I recently purchased a new pistol and revolver. I've been careful to learn proper technique; grip, stance, target acquisition, sight picture, etc. I am not a great shot, but I have made real progress. Knowing how to do it right, and doing it that way every time is my goal. When I first started fishing with a baitcast reel I had to deliberately focus on every part of the cast to get it right. Now after years of doing it, I just focus on the spot I want to hit. I want shooting to be the same way. So what's your point you might ask.
My point is good technique makes for good results. There are always exceptions. One look at Jim Furyk's golf swing will prove that you can do well even if you don't do it "right", but most of us mere mortals need every advantage we can get.Wildalaska
Moderator
Dang, now I know why I miss an occasional shot on the man sized target at 100 yards with my 9mm Browning or SIG 210. Its that dumb 40 plus year old habit of puttin my finger in front of the trigger guard
WildilljustshootonehandedAlaska ™©2002-2010
Archer-1911
New member
Why would you even try it in the first place? The idea has never even crossed my mind.
AcridSaint
New member
Finger in front of the guard is a well-known and perfectly acceptable technique. It won't cause your other finger to suddenly forget how to shoot. The advantage to moving it off of the guard and onto the grip of the weapon is that it allows you to get a tighter hold which may be necessary for certain types of shooting.
I was a finger on the guard shooter until I took my first defensive handgun class and was asked to try it out the other way. Sure enough, it gave me a bit more weapon control allowing quicker follow-up shots. That's the only benefit and the only downside. While it may not be "in favor" it's not really a detriment to shooting stability like the teacup method or some other "outdated" shooting techniques.
I was a finger on the guard shooter until I took my first defensive handgun class and was asked to try it out the other way. Sure enough, it gave me a bit more weapon control allowing quicker follow-up shots. That's the only benefit and the only downside. While it may not be "in favor" it's not really a detriment to shooting stability like the teacup method or some other "outdated" shooting techniques.
Archer-1911
New member
Response to AcridSaint
I don't believe that is what he is talking about as I understand it he is putting the trigger finger of his non dominant hand on top of his shooting finger and then pulling the trigger with... I guess the non dominant hand putting pressure on the trigger finger? Or is it equal pressure? I'm still highly confused as to how he even thought of doing that.
I don't believe that is what he is talking about as I understand it he is putting the trigger finger of his non dominant hand on top of his shooting finger and then pulling the trigger with... I guess the non dominant hand putting pressure on the trigger finger? Or is it equal pressure? I'm still highly confused as to how he even thought of doing that.