Boston: "We have gun powder purchase laws here"

R

rajbcpa

New member
I live in NY and traveled to Mass. on business a few years ago. I tried to buy powder, primers, bullets and brass at a sporting goods store - NO DEAL.

In Mass. you need a state issued ammo purchase license to buy these items.

As a result of the events of this week in Boston, I assume this will become a federal law now.

The gun-grabbers will stop at nothing!
 
Its not actually an ammo license. Its one of the three types of gun permits that the state issues. Any of the three will allow you to purchase ammo or parts to make your own. You need a license to buy lead round balls here. :confused:
 
Last edited:
N.E. Redneck - that's a purchase license, correct? Is it also required in order to possess ammunition or ammunition components? In other words, if you drove to another state and stocked up with ammo and reloading components, then drove back home, would you be breaking the law if you didn't have that license?
 
that's a purchase license, correct? Is it also required in order to possess ammunition or ammunition components? In other words, if you drove to another state and stocked up with ammo and reloading components, then drove back home, would you be breaking the law if you didn't have that license?
Click to expand...

Purchase or possession - so yes, you would be breaking the law if you purchase ammo or components here in NH (for example) and then return to Massachusetts, unless you have the appropriate license. For that reason, some shops in NH, particularly those near the state line, will ask for proof of NH residency or the correct Mass license when selling ammo, even though they're not legally required to.

The statute is Chapter 140, Section 131 of the Mass. General Laws.
 
So I guess this means the law didn't deter the bad guys in Boston?

This is my shocked face!

Next you will tell me that only the law abiding are affected by such laws....

Gregg
 
Purchase or possession - so yes, you would be breaking the law if you purchase ammo or components here in NH (for example) and then return to Massachusetts, unless you have the appropriate license. For that reason, some shops in NH, particularly those near the state line, will ask for proof of NH residency or the correct Mass license when selling ammo, even though they're not legally required to.

The statute is Chapter 140, Section 131 of the Mass. General Laws.
Click to expand...
So, when that law passed, they created an entire new class of criminals (those possessing ammunition components without a license)? Sweet!
 
Unless a federal permit to purchase ammo is passed this will change nothing. Just makes the process of extracting the powder from live cartridges more expensive, time comsuming and generally difficult. Honestly though you can make many other powerful explosives from household items sold at any Walmart or Hardware store. Sad to say, if there is a will there is a way.
 
Honestly though you can make many other powerful explosives from household items sold at any Walmart or Hardware store. Sad to say, if there is a will there is a way.
Click to expand...

"Back in the day," you had to scrounge around to find the Anarchist's Cookbook or Army demo manuals. But with the internet today, the information is right there on your screen. It wouldn't surprise anybody if it turns out the Boston bombers downloaded the "how to" information on bomb making from the internet. Sometimes the bad guys use our freedoms to harm us; doesn't mean we are willing to give up those freedoms.

Gregg
 
After the Oklahoma City bombing they started looking at large fertilizer purchases all over the country. I was wondering why they didn't figure out that gunpowder was an explosive. I'm waiting now for them to limit or restrict loading components. It's going to happen and I think soon.
 
Unless a federal permit to purchase ammo is passed this will change nothing. Just makes the process of extracting the powder from live cartridges more expensive, time comsuming and generally difficult.
Click to expand...

It isn't like it is some huge state surrounded by a mote. Pulling cartridges for smokeless powder would be far less efficient than just driving a few hundred miles to buy "whatever."

Unlike some previous bombers (OKC, earlier World Trade Center bombings) these guys didn't get caught because of some stupid oversight shortly after the event. Maybe they were just lucky but it's possible they are actually smarter than the average bear. People like that probably didn't sit around taking apart cartridges. Very well may not be from the state at all.

Gregg
 
It does beg the question - at what point does the rational person begin to understand that it is impossible to remove any and all potentially dangerous objects from the world?
 
I'm waiting now for them to limit or restrict loading components. It's going to happen and I think soon.
Click to expand...

There was a lot of talk about putting taggants in powder.

The real reason such restrictions haven't been put in place is that smokeless powder isn't an explosive. It burns, doesn't explode. It is very difficult to make a true bomb with any real power from smokeless powder. Easier with the old fashioned black powder. Which all that white smoke suggests was used here.

With all the wars around the world and all the various terrorist groups, it isn't that hard to get your hands on some kind of military grade explosives. (Look at all the foreign created drugs that are sold on the street.) Even if we are talking about hand grenades or 40mm rifle grenades. Your explosive velocity goes WAY up. The authorities are much more worried about bad guys smuggling in explosives than with some guy in his basement with a couple pounds of Bullseye.

The rules are already different for black powder than smokeless. And there are alternatives to true black powder.... any changes in the laws would probably go that direction.

Gregg
 
After the Oklahoma City bombing they started looking at large fertilizer purchases all over the country. I was wondering why they didn't figure out that gunpowder was an explosive.
Click to expand...
There are "High Explosives", and "Low Explosives". Gun powders are not High Explosives in that they yield less explosive power than High Explosives (Plastic explosive, Dynamite, TNT, etc.) and therefore are not very efficient in producing bombs. Nevertheless, anti-gun emotionalism will likely produce a move to ban, control, eliminate, license them in light of the recent bombing, if it turns out that gun powder was used in the bombing.
 
at what point does the rational person begin to understand that it is impossible to remove any and all potentially dangerous objects from the world?
Click to expand...

Exactly. I have a 40 x 50 shop building that has all kinds of interesting farm equipment in it. Also my reloading stuff. I've told both my kids over the years that the most dangerous "never play with" stuff in there is the gasoline. Several five gallon plastic gas cans are always in there. Gas and diesel and kerosene are available anywhere without anybody even glancing at you. Few additives and some ingenuity and you have something far more dangerous. It was a guy with gasoline that killed all those people in a night club years ago.

Gregg
 
tulsamal got it right. As I was reading this thread, I'm thinking 'gasoline'.

Walk up to a pump, put in a card - or better yet go inside and put 10 bucks on pump 2, fill a can (EPA, and several other alphabet agencies, approved, but of course), walk away, and voila --- bomb material. Maybe some diesel, and all that styrofoam you've been saving from all that junk you get from electronic stores and shipped in off the internet.

How stupid it is too try to restrict all these products that can hurt people.

Bottom line is, 'do a crime - do the time'. A lot of time, severely, and swiftly to justice.
 
I have seen many news reports that say the investigators believe that smokeless gun powder was used in Boston.

When the video is played there is a large cloud of white smoke, so I was assuming it was black powder too.
 
The ridiculous has begun.

How anyone equates a bombing with firearms and the Second Amendment is beyond me. Perhaps a Mohron might.

SOURCE

Actor blames Boston attack on gun culture: ’2nd amendment must go’
4:06 PM 04/16/2013

Actor and comedian Jay Mohr waded into the gun debate on Twitter after Monday’s deadly terrorist attacks at the Boston Marathon.

“What bothers me most about today is that we’re getting used 2 it. ENOUGH. 2nd amendment must go. Violence has 2 stop. Culture MUST change,” the Jerry Maguire actor tweeted Monday night.

<MORE>
Click to expand...
 
Strange that these experts could suggest that gunpowder would be used. They know it was not or they are just being puppeteered.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top