I don't remember all the details, but...
when I was a young Field Arty LT, 1964, I was given a pair of bino's, 7X50, IIRC, to use to train to adjust arty fires from Observation Posts near the impact zone at Ft. Lewis, WA.
Although the bino's I was issued were not M6's, the principle of the reticle design was the same - designed to allow measurement of vertical and horizontal deviation from the target to the artillery rounds fired in the "adjustment phase" of target engagement with artillery.
More specifically - the horizontal line in the reticle was marked at 10 mil intervals, both left and right of center. So the observer centered the reticle on the target, then noted how many mils left or right the incoming rounds (usually 2 arty rounds fired simultaneouly by adjacent cannons at the firing site) missed the target.
After observing the left/right deviation in mils, the observer multiplied that deviation by the distance (in thousands) from observer to target (called "the T factor), and notified the Fire Direction Center, by radio, of the adjustment needed to bring the adjusting rounds on line with the target.
We used the 2 short parallel lines in the center of the reticle just to keep the target in the center of the field of view.
As for the vertical reticle to the far right side of the field of view, it was not used for field arty purposes. I inquired about its use, and was told that, "It has something to do with adjusting machinegun fires".
About seven years later, as a Captain, I researched "controlled fires" machine gun "barrages", as a WW I tactic, and a very deadly tactic it was, but I never found the connection between the vertical bino reticle and the tactic.
Ask a Fort Benning GA "Infantry Board" alumnus.