Big Brother gets bigger, says global privacy study

defjon

New member
According to a new international privacy report, governments around the world are increasingly invading the privacy of citizens with surveillance, identification systems, and archiving of private data.

Driven by concern over immigration and border control, countries have been quick to implement database, identity, and fingerprinting systems, according to the 2007 International Privacy Ranking report.

There was also an increase in the trend of governments archiving data on the geographic, communications, and financial records of citizens, as well as enacting legislation intended to increase the reach into individuals' private lives, the report found.

"At the same time, technological advances, technology standards, interoperability between information systems, and the globalization of information have placed extraordinary pressure on the few remaining privacy safeguards," the report says. "The effect of these developments has been to create surveillance societies that nurture hostile environments for privacy."

Specifically, governments have implemented or proposed use of fingerprint and iris-scanning biometrics, real-time tracking and monitoring through communications channels, geographic vehicle and mobile phone tracing, national DNA databases, global information-sharing agreements, and the elimination of anonymity in cyberspace.

The lowest-ranking countries in terms of privacy protections continue to be Malaysia, Russia, and China, with Greece, Romania, and Canada ranked highest.

In terms of statutory protections and privacy enforcement, the United States is the worst country in the "democratic world" and is outranked by both India and the Philippines on overall privacy protection. The U.S. has fallen into the "black" category reserved for countries with "endemic surveillance."

In the European Union, the worst-ranked country is the United Kingdom, particularly with regard to surveillance. Specifically, councils in England and Wales continue to spread surveillance policies, including RFID, CCTV, ID and data sharing, and road user tracking, according to the report.



Sources:
http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-983...ml?tag=newsmap
http://blogs.pcworld.com/staffblog/archives/006143.html
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/01/...ss/ptend03.php
http://news.digitaltrends.com/news/s..._overall_in_07
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/200...-top-surv.html
 
Only one of your links actually brought me to the story. The rest of the links were broken.

I find this disturbing which is the biggest reason why I won't be voting for any of the Republican candidates in the upcoming election. I have not heard any of these candidates (except Ron Paul) decry the policies that have led to the decline of privacy.

Whether a Democrat will do any better is questionable, but I think it's worth a shot.

It disgusts me that I have to choose between privacy and gun rights.

Fortunately I can still vote for legislators who respect both, at the state and national level.
 
I don't think the democrats are any better on privacy, such as the Patriot Act and Homegrown Terrorism Act (whatever it is called). These things keep getting passed despite a democrat controlled congress. And once they have all control, they will add disarmamnet of the populace to the list. Both parties are heading us to a police state, each in their own way.
 
Back
Top