Wildalaska
Moderator
http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/07/14/perry_gun_ban/index.html
Now granted this smarmy, giggly article is designed to point out the hypocrisy of Gun Owners when its push come to shove, but isnt it more than that?
We go back to the issue of property rights...in this case evidently a management company managing a publically owned facility...dont they have the right to control their facility?.
On the other hand, could it be said that the management company is acting unreasonably in light of the sociopolical status of the attendees? But, asuming they made an exemption for them, would they also have to make an exemption for the Death Daddy Hip Hop Convention?
Or is it easier just to inconvenience or disarm some so as not to discriminate against others?
And constitutionally, how do you balance property rtights with gun rights in a scenario like the above
WildlookingforwardtoyourthoughtsAlaska ™©2002-2011
Now granted this smarmy, giggly article is designed to point out the hypocrisy of Gun Owners when its push come to shove, but isnt it more than that?
We go back to the issue of property rights...in this case evidently a management company managing a publically owned facility...dont they have the right to control their facility?.
On the other hand, could it be said that the management company is acting unreasonably in light of the sociopolical status of the attendees? But, asuming they made an exemption for them, would they also have to make an exemption for the Death Daddy Hip Hop Convention?
Or is it easier just to inconvenience or disarm some so as not to discriminate against others?
And constitutionally, how do you balance property rtights with gun rights in a scenario like the above
WildlookingforwardtoyourthoughtsAlaska ™©2002-2011