Best choice for first modern revolver

S

Shooter2675

New member
I am by no means a new gun owner, and I have a few handguns, but I do not own a new revolver. My only revolver is a Nagant M1895 revolver, and while I enjoy it, I want something more modern so I do not wear it out.

I am not sure about which caliber to get. I am a reloader, and from what I have read, revolver brass, especially low pressure loads, will last a long time.

Obviously, the 357 Magnum is one of my choices, as is the 44 Magnum. Howbeee, I am also considering an S&W in 460 S&W or a Ruger in 454 Casull, because I can reload .45 Colt pretty cheap. What would you recommend?

Then, I cannot decide between a Ruger or a Smith and Wesson. I am leaning toward Ruger because of the solid frame, good customer service, and no key-hole like the S&W frames. Howveee, I am open to either if there is a major reason for one over the other.

Thanks for your advice,

John
 
You could never go wrong with a S&W 66, 686, 19, 29, etc. as well as the Ruger GP100 or SP101. All are stout, reliable, quality guns that will serve you well.
 
357 offers such immense loading variety... from bunny fart, low pressure HBWC to some full magnum loads. My choice would be a GP100 standard or Match Champion ... can’t go wrong.
 
Shooter2675 said:
I am by no means a new gun owner, and I have a few handguns, but I do not own a new revolver. My only revolver is a Nagant M1895 revolver, and while I enjoy it, I want something more modern so I do not wear it out.

I am not sure about which caliber to get. I am a reloader, and from what I have read, revolver brass, especially low pressure loads, will last a long time.

Obviously, the 357 Magnum is one of my choices, as is the 44 Magnum. Howbeee, I am also considering an S&W in 460 S&W or a Ruger in 454 Casull, because I can reload .45 Colt pretty cheap. What would you recommend?

Then, I cannot decide between a Ruger or a Smith and Wesson. I am leaning toward Ruger because of the solid frame, good customer service, and no key-hole like the S&W frames. Howveee, I am open to either if there is a major reason for one over the other.

Thanks for your advice,

John
Click to expand...

What are you going to do with it, and what do you mean by "modern"?

If "modern" means "double action, swing out cylinder", and "why" is "all lawful purposes", then what mk70ss said.
 
Ok, I guess I should have been more clear.

By “modern” I meant something other than my 100 year old Nagant, and something is double action, swing out cylinder.

My “why” is mainly for target shooting and having fun at the range. I do not intend to hunt with it, at least for now.

My only other consideration was that I am planning on eventually buying a matching caliber rifle, probably a Henry lever action.
 
It's 686 vs GP100 vs Taurus 66. Despite what peeps say 6" for the range 4" for everything else, 6" is pretty dang long for the range too. I like 6" barrels, but at 25yrds, I don't think the difference is noticeable (myself).

For range, revolvers are great fun. I like mine. Don't get internet illusion though about ammo options. There aren't many, hardly any, that do better than a 9mm and the options are smaller. Luckygunner ammo test results 9mm vs 357. Yes, the weights are hugely different between 147gr vs 158gr bullet--not. :) The HST 147 does about what every good 357 does, and outperforms many other 357 loads in both 2 and 4 inch revolver barrels.

Price for factory ammo is going to be $20 a box and up. $15 with shipping days are done.
 
Shooter2675 said:
Ok, I guess I should have been more clear.

By “modern” I meant something other than my 100 year old Nagant, and something is double action, swing out cylinder.

My “why” is mainly for target shooting and having fun at the range. I do not intend to hunt with it, at least for now.

My only other consideration was that I am planning on eventually buying a matching caliber rifle, probably a Henry lever action.
Click to expand...

Not for CCW?

My old S&W 19-4, 4" is a sweet shooter. "Just sayin'." There are a lot of older gun that would also fit your purpose.
 
Also, to the Taurus 66; it lacks refinement, has a better trigger than the GP100 (therefore more accurate in my hands), has more grip options than the GP100 (Thailand Ebay grips are good), etc. The lasting of the timing is my concern, but it is more mental than experiential.

It's up to you if the $350 vs $600+ is worth it.

I have owned 3 or more of each 686, GP100, and Taurus 66. I think the Taurus 66 is an okay choice.

I do DO NOT think the EAA Windictor 4" 357 is a good choice if you are shooting 357. If you look into going that route, start researching the older posts about info on the Windictor model probably starting out a 38spl, stamped a 357, and not much historical changes between the release of the 38 first and then the 357.
 
Double action rules out the excellent revolvers from Freedom Arms, although for merely target shooting, single action does just fine.
Personally, I would prefer a S&W, most likely one of the L frame 7-shot 38/357s with a 5" barrel.
 
Ruger man that I am, the Smith & Wesson Model 586 is in my opinion the best double action revolver to come down the pike yet.

An L-Framed DA revolver in .357 Magnum is about the most versatile hangun yet!


Bob Wright
 
Everybody should own at least one 4" medium frame double action 357 magnum
revolver with adjustable sights. Ruger, S&W--whatever. Personally I've got
a weak spot for Pinned and Recessed Smith and Wessons. An older Model 19
fits my needs quite nicely.
 
I am a single-action man myself. I really respect Bob’s opinion.

.357 is small enough to be light and inexpensive to shoot, accurate enough to compete with, powerful enough to hold a fella’s interest, powerful enough to hunt deer with (almost.)

You really can’t go wrong with a top name revolver in .357

Here is what I don’t like about .357...

When loaded to it’s full potential it’s bullet goes supersonic and makes that “crack!” sound. I find that supersonic rounds hurt my ears more so I double-muff... in the ear foam cylinders and great big external “can” muffs. Guys at an indoor range will not thank you for that, either.

Recoil is “snappy”. These high velocity guns “slap” my paw, and “twist” in my hand. I can tolerate but don’t prefer that.

Some people say “oh, just shoot .38 special target loads” and this is very true but I always worried about building up a ring of crud at the shorter .38 special location in the chamber so I just loaded target loads in .357 cases. This is more pleasing because the bullet also seats closer to the forcing cone but I don’t really know if that matters.

Since you are new to revolvers, we know you are going to want to load some up “full house” to see what that’s like. You should! But then you’ll wonder “what about the boys with the bigger house? .44 magnum?”

.44 magnum can also be supersonic, cracky, snappy, slappy AND pushy... but...

You can load some great big heavy bullets to just under supersonic and get a much more pleasant behavior: “boomy”, “pushy”, “lifting your arm each shot” as the energy is happening a bit slower. It’s still a massive amount of energy. You’ll still be shaking dust off the lights at an indoor range, but I don’t need to double-muff (I still probably would unless outdoors.)

You can keep loading down until someone says “oh! You can shoot .44 specials!” But... why? We have .4r magnum brass. Just load down.

Even loaded way light, I would prefer hunting with a bigger bore handgun. Starting with a big hole and heavy weight is more forgiving of my mistakes. It’s bone smashing.

Once you load the .44 magnum to full house, the other big bore handguns, while interesting, are pretty much a novelty unless you plan on hunting buffalo. Having shot the .454 pretty extensively, I backed off to .44 magnum as my hunting pistol. More than enough.

The only downside to .41 is you will wonder what the fuss is about .44 magnum. I would be pleased to own one but I have a .44. A fella that has a .41 is telling me “I been there, done that, and this is my idea of perfect” and it might well be. Once you’ve been there and done that.

Regarding brand:
If you buy a “top brand” revolver it will have top resale value.
If you are patient, shop around, and buy a top brand revolver used, you may well enjoy the revolver for years and if you take care of it, easily sell it for what you paid fot it, or better.

If you buy a revolver that doesn’t have a sterling reputation, you’ll pay less up front. You may well get an excellent product or you might get a clinker and your fun hobby just became an irritating chore. As a new guy to revolvers, you’ll never know the quality you are missing. You payed less up front, but your resale value is more than proportionally reduced.

An experienced revolver guy might pick up one made in South Pakinstein for $127 after an educated inspection , fiddle with a stone and some lube for half an hour and have a great shooter and if it breaks.. hey, it only cost about a couple boxes of factory ammunition.

Just my thoughts!
 
The S&W 586/686 guns are top notch. The 4" guns are great, the 6" ones shoot great but are a little heavy. I am not a fan of the double action pull on the Ruger guns but I bet you could get used to it. The Rugers are beefier than the S&W, I guess because they are castings rather than forgings, not as pretty to me.
You won't go wrong with either one.
 
Very good information, thank you!

Stinkeypete was really convincing about the 44 magnum. I can cast my own bullets, so really, how much more expensive would 44 magnum be to shoot?
 
Ruger Blackhawk convertibles, .357/9mm or .45 Colt/ACP. Whichever you'd rather have.

I will say I lean more toward the .45's, I just don't like being stuck with 6 shots of .357 when it could be 7. That and there are many double action revolvers in .357 that are better, really only one or two double action .45 Colt revolvers out there worth buying, but aren't necessarily better than the Blackhawk.
 
Buy the one that fits your hand best. Big calibre Ruger revolvers like the Redhawk and SuperRedhawk, etc. tend to fit normal sized hands where Smith N frames do not.
You should be able to try all of 'em on for size in your local gun shop. And consider the cost and availability of the ammo and brass.
"...will last a long time..." Yep. The load does matter. Most of it depends on what you're doing with the revolver. Really hot loads aren't necessary, even for hunting. Even then handgun brass rarely, if ever, requires steps like trimming.
 
How about a Dan Wesson ? Get a Pistol Pac, 4 guns in one, cover everything from concealed carry through formal Bullseye.
 
@Truthteller... let me tell you a story.

My dad and I used to enjoy shooting together. Mostly this was Cowboy Action style guns, but the old man lives in North Carolina and loved driving in the country with a destination of some ol’ gun shop one of his fellas told him about. We’d visit each other, go to each other’s ranges, shoot our latest toys, chew the fat with the fellas. Good memories.

As a result, I’ve shot all but a few Ruger Single Actions and have even gotten better than passable at slicking a new one up. (On my bucket list: Single Seven and flat top 3-screw.)

As a reloader, the only reason I would get a convertible.45 or .357 would be as potential resale value to a non-reloader. My hand loads for .45 Colt were exactly the components of my handloads for .45 acp but they properly headspace on the rim. Why mess around?

My .357 handloads were whatever I wanted them to be, but tuned to what my gun liked. Sure “9mm is cheap” but not as cheap as making your own and in my gun... they were not grouping well at all compared to my target loads.

I was a .45 Colt man. .45 Colt Blackhawk (stainless Bisley 5 1/2” Talo Exclusive), .45 Colt Ruger Only loads, .454 Casull revolver and lever action rifle. 1911 .45acp.

My dad was .44. .44 Special were his favorites but he ran em often in his Blackhawks and marlin octagonal lever action. While I remained generally faithful to .45, the old man would often pull out the craziest stuff. “Hey, I just got this .308 H&K ultra modern battle rifle! Let’s shoot it! You want some cute little .22 black powder revolvers? I couldn’t resist and bought 4 of em.”

Now, time passes and nobody is getting any younger. My dad gave me his Bowen .44 Magnum. He had more fun driving and visiting with Mr. Bowen, turns out they had a lot in common. This was back when waiting times were only 6 months or so.

In my experience, you could not tell the difference between a ruger Blackhawk .44 magnum or .45 Colt when both are handloaded to whichever purpose suits.

.45 has a rich history but so does .44

The main difference being if you end up needing to buy ammunition in a pinch, it’s a rare gun shop where you can find any .45 Colt at all, let alone a selection. I reckon that’s the one time one might be grateful for that .45 acp cylinder. .45 Colt in double action is for fellas like me that won’t join any club that will have em. Except I’m a .44 Magnum guy now as I use my Dad’s pistol and remember our range sessions and hunting trips fondly.

Hunting? In the woods we used our lever guns and overlooking the marshes he used his dad’s 30-06 and I used my Marlin 30-30 with “Paco Kelly” handloads we can’t talk more about here. Now I have the 30-06 after my dad showed me his purple shoulder saying “I think it’s time to pass this thing along and I’ll tell you what my dad said to me when he gave it to me: “this damn thing kicks like a mule, you take it!”
 
The only common double action revolvers I would really call "modern" are Dan Wessons and Rugers. Most other revolvers commonly available are simple variations on either Colt or Smith designs that are about 100 years old.

Even though I don't consider many revolvers "modern", some of them are still fine revolvers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top