Adventurer_96
New member
Two of my recent posts have talked about my quest to buy a Beretta 92 in an effort to complete my "must have" gun list.
However, I do have a few others on the list that I've been thinking about lately and a trip to the local gun store brought out a very interesting possibility here. If the readers who helped with advice on the Berettas think I'm indecisive, well, you're 100% correct!
I've wanted a 1911 since I was 10 and shot one for the first time, first pistol ever actually. However, each time I stop into a store or go to a show and see a low end one for $500+ I feel intimidated. Not to mention, I'd always wanted to get a WWII collector's piece as an occasional shooter versus a CCW.
I decided to look for a Beretta at a local shop today. No luck on that front, but the guy behind the counter was really helpful and a 1911 fan. I explained to him that I just don't feel comfortable with the SA design of the gun because I've never really shot one much, and I didn't mention that I don't know a whole heck of a lot about what to look for.
He showed me two very interesting pistols. The first was an Auto Ordnance .45 in Good shape I'd say, with decent fit and finish that they wanted $300 for. Oddly enough, it was my wife's reaction to the gun's design that intrigued me. The dealer pointed out the safety features on the pistol and my wife thought it was very well designed, even though she felt it might be a bit too heavy for her. It rekindled the image of a .45 as a CCW which I think originally came from the opening scenes of Magnum PI.
The next one he showed me was the one which I could see myself owning except for a couple of points which I'll describe. It's a Remington Rand WWII production with the US Government Property marking on the left side, I can't remember if it's on the slide or frame. Here's the gotchas: It's had the hammer bobbed so you can't even draw it back with both thumbs, so that would have to be replaced. And, here's the worst (or best???) part: It's been triple-chromed all over. What the guy pointed out was that there had been some pitting on the slide which was barely noticable due to the refinishing and the layers of chrome which had been polished. He figures that it sat somewhere for a long time and got some surface pitting and the refinish was just a way to keep a very functional gun looking decent. Here's the best part though: They want $250 for the thing!
Here's my big questions for the very knowledgable folks on this forum:
1. I've searched the posts and it seems like you should stay away from Auto Ordnance 1911's due to poor quality control in the manufacturing process with forging, etc. True?
2. Would a Remington Rand like I described be an option for CCW? I think for $250 it would be a good base gun for some work, like fixing the hammer and maybe a refinish.
3. What do I need to look at on the RR to determine the validity of what the dealer was saying?
4. Should I wait and spend twice that on my 92FS??
I've been waiting for a long time for both a Beretta and a 1911, and it seems like I may have an inexpensive option to buy the 1911 now if it's what he said it is. Plus, I'm sure I would use a 1911 for CCW whereas I might not with the Beretta.
Thanks again for all of your insight in advance, and also for putting up with my indecision.
Check Six.
However, I do have a few others on the list that I've been thinking about lately and a trip to the local gun store brought out a very interesting possibility here. If the readers who helped with advice on the Berettas think I'm indecisive, well, you're 100% correct!
I've wanted a 1911 since I was 10 and shot one for the first time, first pistol ever actually. However, each time I stop into a store or go to a show and see a low end one for $500+ I feel intimidated. Not to mention, I'd always wanted to get a WWII collector's piece as an occasional shooter versus a CCW.
I decided to look for a Beretta at a local shop today. No luck on that front, but the guy behind the counter was really helpful and a 1911 fan. I explained to him that I just don't feel comfortable with the SA design of the gun because I've never really shot one much, and I didn't mention that I don't know a whole heck of a lot about what to look for.
He showed me two very interesting pistols. The first was an Auto Ordnance .45 in Good shape I'd say, with decent fit and finish that they wanted $300 for. Oddly enough, it was my wife's reaction to the gun's design that intrigued me. The dealer pointed out the safety features on the pistol and my wife thought it was very well designed, even though she felt it might be a bit too heavy for her. It rekindled the image of a .45 as a CCW which I think originally came from the opening scenes of Magnum PI.
The next one he showed me was the one which I could see myself owning except for a couple of points which I'll describe. It's a Remington Rand WWII production with the US Government Property marking on the left side, I can't remember if it's on the slide or frame. Here's the gotchas: It's had the hammer bobbed so you can't even draw it back with both thumbs, so that would have to be replaced. And, here's the worst (or best???) part: It's been triple-chromed all over. What the guy pointed out was that there had been some pitting on the slide which was barely noticable due to the refinishing and the layers of chrome which had been polished. He figures that it sat somewhere for a long time and got some surface pitting and the refinish was just a way to keep a very functional gun looking decent. Here's the best part though: They want $250 for the thing!
Here's my big questions for the very knowledgable folks on this forum:
1. I've searched the posts and it seems like you should stay away from Auto Ordnance 1911's due to poor quality control in the manufacturing process with forging, etc. True?
2. Would a Remington Rand like I described be an option for CCW? I think for $250 it would be a good base gun for some work, like fixing the hammer and maybe a refinish.
3. What do I need to look at on the RR to determine the validity of what the dealer was saying?
4. Should I wait and spend twice that on my 92FS??
I've been waiting for a long time for both a Beretta and a 1911, and it seems like I may have an inexpensive option to buy the 1911 now if it's what he said it is. Plus, I'm sure I would use a 1911 for CCW whereas I might not with the Beretta.
Thanks again for all of your insight in advance, and also for putting up with my indecision.
Check Six.