I still don't understand why so many jurisdictions insist on making people ruin their hearing.
Because its the law. Because its BEEN the law for longer than most of us have been alive. Because tv and movies only show bad guys using them for silent killing. Because they think that if they allow silencers we will have a wave of murder sweep the nation since we can now shoot people without the neighbors hearing the shot (forgetting all about how noisey knives, ropes, hammers, golf clubs, baseball bats, rocks, 2x4s, bare HANDS, etc..are)
I have heard that there are places (in parts of Europe) that actually
require suppressors for hunting.
The real world issue is that if "silencers" were common and easily available, then they
would be criminally misused. And since many shootings are reported to police only because someone heard the shots, that more crimes would go undetected, or go longer before detection.
And, on balance, the authorities seem to feel that the risk to our hearing (for which we can wear protection) is less than the general risk to public safety if "silencers" were common.
That's why they " insist on making people ruin their hearing."
Personally, I disagree, but that's just me.
One thing about using a "silenced" pistol, or any NFA weapon for self defense, it won't go over well with most juries. ITs an image thing, and sadly juries are not always made up of people who look beyond surface images.