According to the Army, these are their personal weapons:
About the Army: weapons
The AR-15 is not there, because although it looks similar to the M4, it is not the same and everybody knows that it is not capable fully automatic fire.
But the "weapon of war" in their list? The Remington 700 in 7.62x51 bolt action rifle (M24 Sniper Weapon System).
Thus if "weapons of war" should be kept from civilian hands, it is bolt actions in .308 caliber and above that should be restricted and not the AR-15.
My point is that of course the whole "weapon of war" narrative is silly. ALL WEAPONS are WEAPONS OF WAR. The bow an arrow was a weapon of war.
I think that this is the point that we should emphasize when antis try to steer the narrative on gun control towards the reasonableness of trying to keep "weapons of war" out of people's hands.
This narrative is just a ploy to control any and all gun ownership, because the inconsistency in the logic is that most modern hunting weapons are an evolution of a weapon of war, or are in fact weapons that are actively used by modern armies today!
Controlling "weapons of war" means regulating ("abridging" in the language of 2A) ALL firearms! Indeed, all weapons.
About the Army: weapons
The AR-15 is not there, because although it looks similar to the M4, it is not the same and everybody knows that it is not capable fully automatic fire.
But the "weapon of war" in their list? The Remington 700 in 7.62x51 bolt action rifle (M24 Sniper Weapon System).
Thus if "weapons of war" should be kept from civilian hands, it is bolt actions in .308 caliber and above that should be restricted and not the AR-15.
My point is that of course the whole "weapon of war" narrative is silly. ALL WEAPONS are WEAPONS OF WAR. The bow an arrow was a weapon of war.
I think that this is the point that we should emphasize when antis try to steer the narrative on gun control towards the reasonableness of trying to keep "weapons of war" out of people's hands.
This narrative is just a ploy to control any and all gun ownership, because the inconsistency in the logic is that most modern hunting weapons are an evolution of a weapon of war, or are in fact weapons that are actively used by modern armies today!
Controlling "weapons of war" means regulating ("abridging" in the language of 2A) ALL firearms! Indeed, all weapons.
Last edited: