Just last Sun. afternoon I was shooting both an Automag III and an M1 carbine that belong to a buddy. I was shooting his reloads which used a 90 gr. Hornady HP-XTP. Got some failures to feed the HP in the carbine, but they ran perfect in the AMT.
Looking in the Hornady 5th ed. They have loads for both carbine and handgun ( the test guns they list for each are an M1 carbine 17 1/2" barrel, and they use a 10" T/C for the handgun). For handgun loads the max loads generally are .5 to 1 grain lighter than the max carbine loads for each of the powders that they use in both. Do not use the max carbine loads in a handgun.
M.V. listed for max handgun loads are lower due to both reduced load, and shorter barrel. When you are compare the charts, the "same" load when fired out a carbine will be about 300 fps faster than in a handgun. Carbine loads (with the 90 gr. bullet) top out around 2200-2300 fps, handgun loads top out around 1900 (again keep in mind that this is in a 10" T/C).
I'm not going to print the load my buddy used (if I'm reading his chicken scratching on the label right, it is more than a little "warm".) As johnwill "imagines", the muzzle flash is "pretty impressive"
- easily visible on a cloudy afternoon. I thought the Automag III was a fun companion gun to the M1 carbine.
Looking for an energy level comparison I grabbed a Winchester ammo product guide, and in the section for HANDGUN ammo, they list their .30 carbine Super-X 110gr HSP as having m.v. of 1720fps and m.e. of 783 ft-lbs. Compare this to their .357 mag 158 gr jhp at 1235 fps and 535ft-lbs Their .44 mag 240 gr hsp at 1180 fps has 741 ft-lbs. Make of it what you will.
bergie