Bad News

woodit

New member
"Remember that imaginary NRA special ABC could do against the NRA. It’s not imaginary. On Monday Night, before Monday Night Football, ABC will be doing a one-hour special on the NRA’s political action in elections. It wasn’t going to be a fair program to begin with. With the new rules, you can bet it’ll be a lot worse.

"And don’t be surprised if Dennis Miller’s editorializing about the evils of guns and Republicans at halftime..."

=====================================
Time we ALL called our local stations...

woodit
======================================

Jewish World Review Oct. 6, 2000 / 7 Tishrei, 5761
Debbie Schlussel


Fairness

It's official, TV stations no longer have to be "fair" or "balanced"
http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- IMAGINE your local TV station endorses Al Gore for President, and then engages in non-stop attacks on George W. Bush’s character, alleging that he may have used drugs and is less than intelligent. Imagine ABC endorsing strict gun control and running a one-hour special attacking Charlton Heston’s character and describing the NRA as a bunch of rednecks. Imagine 24 hours of Hillary Headline News on CNN.

Well, stop imagining. Because, as of Wednesday, any of this stuff could happen, courtesy of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

You know the liberal media? You ain’t seen nothin’ yet. It’s about to get a lot worse.

According to Variety, on Wednesday, the FCC voted 3-2 to lift its political editorial and personal attack rules for the next 60 days. This leaves TV and radio outlets free to endorse candidates, run political editorials, and make character attacks on candidates, without providing free airtime to the other side, a requirement of the Doctrine.

And while the FCC is lifting "political editorial and personal attack rules" for only 60 days, these next 60 days are crucial to candidates in tight races, as they make their final push to the polls.

Candidates like George W. Bush. Candidates like Rick Lazio. Republican candidates trying to hold on to control of Congress. Candidates the liberal media despise. Candidates the media would love to attack, ad hominem, without allowing a response. Right before the election.

And this could become permanent, for all future elections to come.

The FCC lifted rules requiring equal time, under pressure from the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) and the Radio-Television News Directors Association (RTNDA). Both have repeatedly challenged the "political editorial and personal attack rules" in the courts, arguing that it violates their First Amendment rights. And they’ve repeatedly lost, including at the Supreme Court level.

That’s because we, the public, finance the airwaves on which these liberal broadcasters spew their leftist views, on which they show their trashy programming. They can exercise their free speech any day, any time, but not on airwaves that are owned and provided by us. Until now.

Joel Cheatwood, VP of news for CBS TV stations, and Jay Ireland, President of NBC television stations division, tell Variety that they doubt TV outlets will launch unfair attacks because “most broadcasters feel an inherent need to be fair.” Yeah, right. And Bill Clinton “did not have sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky.”

Think Disney Chief Michael Eisner -- a top contributor to Clinton and Gore -- won’t take full advantage of these rules to return his buddies to the White House for another 8 years? Ditto for USA Network chief Barry Diller. And Chaim Saban, head honcho of FOX Kids Network, and a huge Gore fundraiser.

We already see the unfairness and inequity in coverage of Republicans, especially conservatives, on CNNABCCBSNBC, etc. And unleashing a wild dog won’t make him bite less. It has the opposite effect. Until now, there’s, at least, been some semblance of “fairness” and “objectivity.” The key word being, “semblance.”

But even with that, Bush can do no right. He’s an ignorant, spoiled rich kid, with no experience, running on his daddy’s name, according to slanted media portrayals. Lazio’s an arrogant, young punk, who violated a First Lady’s space. And Gore’s a competent, experienced, smart Vietnam Vet from a farm in Carthage, Tennessee, they tell us. Hillary’s a talented, smart lawyer, who’s devoted her life to America’s children, and is a victim of a vast right-wing conspiracy.

Of course, reality elucidates the exact opposite of all of these liberal media narratives. And that’s with equal time rules intact. So, imagine the media propaganda in the next 60 days, without even that.

Liberal Dennis Miller on ABC’s “Monday Night Football” comparing a failed field goal attempt to George W. Bush’s tax plan, or a screwed up play to alleged screwed up integrity of conservative candidates. Or cartoons on FOX Kids telling kids about those big, bad Republicans who want to destroy the environment so their pet dog dies. Or WWF’s “The Rock” telling mindless wrestling viewers on TNN and MTV that Republicans in Congress are “jabronis” (his favorite epithet).

It’s no joke. It’s the FCC’s new reality. And it’s a nightmare.

But we can stop it. The FCC is requiring broadcasters to keep records on how many complaints they receive during the next 60 days, which they must report to the FCC. Assuming they keep honest records –a big assumption -- we owe it to ourselves and the future of sane, fair elections to call, write, or e-mail local and national broadcast outlets when they abuse the new, relaxed rules. If not, you can bet the rules will become permanent, and liberals will win more elections.

Remember that imaginary NRA special ABC could do against the NRA. It’s not imaginary. On Monday Night, before Monday Night Football, ABC will be doing a one-hour special on the NRA’s political action in elections. It wasn’t going to be a fair program to begin with. With the new rules, you can bet it’ll be a lot worse.

And don’t be surprised if Dennis Miller’s editorializing about the evils of guns and Republicans at halftime.

JWR contributor Debbie Schlussel is a Detroit-based commentator, attorney, and sports and entertainment agent. While she reads all of her mail, she regrets she cannot respond to each letter. Send your comments to her by clicking here.


10/03/00: Hillary Lesbian Ads, NRA Infomercials, & Other Stuff You Won’t See on TV
09/29/00: AlGore’s misogynist hate music
09/26/00: Ask Oprah/Regis: “Women’s” Vote Debases Presidency
09/22/00: Gun Control, Nike Slasher Ads, and Other Politically Correct Olympic Tales
09/19/00: Al Sharpton: Real Home of the Whopper
09/15/00: Pedophilia good, religion, bad
09/05/00: Political ADL Should Lose its Tax-Exempt Status
08/29/00: Time for Racist, Sexist WNBA & Other Feminist Girlie Sports Sideshows to Go
08/25/00: Will the Real Boston Globe Plagiarist Please Stand Up?
08/25/00: Cathy Young Doth Protest Too Much, But Facts are Facts
08/22/00: Karenna: Gore Chicklet Doesn't Represent My Generation
08/18/00: NBC: National Kennedy Channel
08/15/00: Give Him an Oscar: Flip-floppin' Lieberman parties with "Jenny Jones" producer
08/11/00: Confessions of An Orthodox Jewish Former Candidate: Why I Won't Vote for Lieberman
08/07/00: Forget About Merit: W's GOP Disses Affirmative Action Foes
08/01/00: What's an Obscene Guy Like You Doing in a Place Like This?: WWF's "The Rock" at the GOP Convention
07/28/00: The Naked Truth: Democrats Pose for Playboy
07/25/00: What Dubyah should have known about his would-be veep
07/21/00: Scouting-out political correctness
07/18/00: When 'Big Brother' is a black supremacist
07/14/00: Ted Kennedy's Hate Crime
07/11/00: Sleeping With the Enemy: Bush Health Care Advisor, Congressman are GOP's Monica, Bill
07/07/00: Survivor: Politically Correct Darwinism
07/05/00: Dummies Across America
06/29/00: Rio Ramirez: Cuban Olympic Diving Defector's What Elian Could've Been
06/26/00: Too Bad it's Miller Time: MNF Pass Rush Over Ratings is Huge Fumble
06/23/00: PETA's McCruel Child Abuse
06/20/00: Clinton's my father, too
06/16/00: Hillary Pimps the Sex Trade
06/13/00: 'Musical' mind molesters
06/08/00: Bigoted and Rich: Corzine's election belies Dems' phony image
06/06/00: Slumming it: My Night on Slumlord Al's "Farm"
06/02/00: Hillary Myths and Facts: What Lazio Must Make Every Voter Know
05/31/00: Welcome to Equality, Babe: Female "Pro" Athletes Stink on Free Market
05/26/00: Signs the Gun-Control Apocalypse May be Upon Us
05/24/00: "Dirty Harry" to Congress: Go Ahead, Make My ADA
05/19/00: Jesse's Digital Plantation
05/17/00: Bobby Knight, Tom Osborne: In Sports, Politics, Good Guys, Authorities Lose, Bad Guys Win
05/12/00: Hey, Million Ignorant Moms: Guns are #1 in Feminine Protection
05/09/00: Clinton Saga is Bad Seinfeld Episode
05/05/00: Barbie Will Never Be President
05/02/00: Greg Craig's Ethics Violations Merit Disbarment
04/25/00: Ain't No Jive Bro: Rapping Republicans Get It Right
04/19/00: Earth Day's Gore-y Details
04/10/00: Whose Ox is Being Gored: Racist Democrats and Other Hypocrisies
04/04/00: Are You Ready For Some Lim-Ball?: Put Rush in the MNF Booth
03/29/00: Oscar Winners' Spaceyed-Out Values, Politics
03/22/00: Good-bye John Skywalker, Hello Darth Buchanan!
03/16/00: Noncens(us)
03/13/00: German Artist's Nazi Abomination Against Giuliani
03/09/00: Hollywood's Clinton Gore Free Speech Hypocrisy
03/01/00: Why I Voted for McSkywalker
02/23/00: Oxygen?: New Chick Channel’s Liberal Anti-Male Agenda Leaves Viewers Gasping
02/07/00: Benetton's Death Penalty Politics
01/28/00: NFL’s Fake Pass at Women
01/25/00: 'Patriotic' MTV?
01/18/00: Civil and right? Hardly
01/12/00: Sticking to my Guns
12/31/99: Go away, Monica!
11/24/99: Million-dollar boobs
11/11/99: It Takes a Sports Team
11/02/99: Unclothing Marilyn
10/26/99: Gerald Ford, racist?
10/12/99: Stop 'Holocaust obsession'
09/22/99: 'Stardumb'
09/03/99: WNBA “players” are the female firefighters of pro sports
08/24/99: Viagra Can't Cure Republican E.D.
08/18/99: Jewish shame: Why does a Jewish 'defense organization' want to put Jewish lives at risk?

© 2000, Debbie Schlussel
 
Here is the link to the above article in JWR: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/schlussel.html

Here is the story in Variety: http://www.variety.com/body.asp?HbkId=61345&CatId=NEWS&SubCat=18&ArticleId=1117787379

Good timing by Democrats in the media. It appears that the media has gone to court to make the lifting of the ban permanent. They're P.O.d at the FCC for only making it a 60 day suspension of the fairness rule. :rolleyes:


------------------
RKBA!
"The people have the right to bear arms for their defense and security"
Ohio Constitution, Article I, Section 4
Concealed Carry is illegal in Ohio.
Ohioans for Concealed Carry Website
 
:mad: What is more infuriating then anything else on earth be it even satan himself, is the idiots that are unable to think for themselves. If 20% of the amerikan population had the IQ of of our spit they'd be a thousand times better, and there would be outrage, but as weak, disgusting and pathetic as they are most of their time will be spent justifying every single action of their goverment and eagerly waiting to call 1-800-I-SNITCH to turn anyone in who doesn't worship their god the .gov. God I HATE them and their *&%$ing media.
 
I guess Wonder Whore II must have fallen behind on some polls again. I wonder if this could actually cause some backlash, like the Boy Scout thing??

------------------
"Liberty is never unalienable; it must be redeemed regularly with the blood of patriots or it always vanishes."
-R.A. Heinlein

[This message has been edited by TAZ (edited October 06, 2000).]
 
I wonder if we can sue them for abriding our 1st amendment rights? We do have the right to be heard and they are denying this to us.



------------------
Richard

The debate is not about guns,
but rather who has the ultimate power to rule,
the People or Government.
RKBA!
 
The media is already doing such a good job of seeming objective while campaigning full tilt for their leftist friends. It grieves me to watch them report news in a way to help viewers draw the medias' desired conclusions.
A couple of sources for info on this subject:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/
http://www.fair.org/media-woes/media-woes.html

ukliam3.gif
 
On the other hand, let the media hang themselves all the way. When they push the envelope with total bias, their remaining credibility will be gone.

However, I have little faith in the general populace to see it.

:mad:
 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 4, 2000

NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:
David Fiske (202) 418-0513





FCC SUSPENDS POLITICAL EDITORIAL AND
PERSONAL ATTACK RULES FOR 60 DAYS;
ASKS PARTIES TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE ON EFFECT OF SUSPENSION

Washington, D.C. – The FCC today suspended its political editorial and personal attack rules for 60 days, and asked parties to then submit evidence on the effect of the suspension
of the rules 60 days after the suspension ends in order to create a better record on which to review the rules.

In a pending lawsuit challenging the two rules, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit had remanded the case to the FCC to supplement its analysis of the rules with
evidence superior to that which had previously been supplied, and based on that evidence, provide its rationale for retaining the rules. The Order notes that the record previously
before the Commission was “old and possibly flawed,” and that the court had encouraged the Commission to “consider modern factual and legal developments” and “to work
from a relatively clean procedural slate.”

In today’s Order, a majority of the Commission made clear that much of the discussion in the Syracuse Peace Council case accompanying the Commission’s repeal of the fairness
doctrine has been rejected. With regard to both rules, the Commission noted that the Court of Appeals had previously rejected the contention that the rules are inextricably tied to
the fairness doctrine. The Commission asked those parties who believe it is not possible to distinguish political editorials and personal attacks from subjects formerly covered by
the fairness doctrine to consider whether the rules at issue should be extended to cover matters that previously were subject to the fairness doctrine.

The political editorial rule provides generally that if a licensee airs an editorial supporting a political candidate, it must notify other candidates for that office of the editorial and
provide them an opportunity to respond on-the-air. Similarly, the personal attack rule provides generally that when, during a program on a controversial issue of public importance,
an attack is made on someone’s integrity, the licensee must inform the subject of the attack and provide an opportunity to respond on-the-air.

The Commission noted that broadcasters have contended generally that the rules have had a “chilling effect” on programming, and specifically that elimination of the political
editorial reply rule would increase broadcast station editorializing. The Commission said that temporarily suspending the rule during the current election period would enable it to
receive updated information on these issues.

Specifically, the Commission asked broadcasters to report on (1) the number of political editorials run during the suspension period, (2) the number of editorials run during prior
election cycles, (3) the nature of the elections on which they editorialize, such as national, state, or local, and (4) whether other media outlets editorialized on those races.

The Commission noted that because the Court of Appeals had asked the FCC to provide further rationale for having reply rules for editorials on political candidates, but not on
other topics, it also needs information concerning broadcasters’ editorial practices more generally. Specifically, it asked the broadcasters to report on (1) whether they editorialize
on topics unrelated to political campaigns, (2) whether the rate of such editorials is increasing or decreasing, and (3) what factors are relevant to a broadcaster’s decision to
editorialize.

With respect to the personal attack rule, the Commission said it expects broadcasters to collect information regarding complaints concerning personal attacks received while the rule
is suspended, and to compare the number and nature of the complaints during this 60-day suspension period to a comparable period while the rule was in effect.

The Commission said it encouraged groups supporting retention of the personal attack rule to also collect evidence and report to the Commission concerning personal attacks that
they would have challenged had the rule not been suspended or that were made during programming not covered by the present rule.

The Commission also said that while it would not rule out either retaining the rules exactly as written or eliminating them entirely, it would profit most if comments in the
proceeding were directed to how the rules could be modified to achieve their fundamental purposes with minimal burden.

Action by the Commission by Order and Request to Update Record (FCC 00-360). Chairman Kennard, Commissioners Ness and Tristani; Commissioners Furchtgott-Roth and
Powell dissenting.

- FCC -
 
I have recently e-mailed my local tv station complaining about unequal coverage before this change took effect. Of course they denied the clam dispite heavy evidence against them. I think though, this won't change the coverage because they want to keep as many people watching the show as possible. This only makes the poor coverage they are doing now, legal.

------------------
John Condon
JPC9@yahoo.com

[This message has been edited by Alphaprimous (edited October 11, 2000).]
 
This sort of thing has been going on not so subtly for the last 40 years. How many mainstream TV journalists voted for McGovern? About 85%. How many voted for Clinton? Again, about 85%. People have been battered to the point of numbness by brazenly insulting media bias. We've learned to live with it. Someone, somewhere, has figured that they can be unambiguously anti-American and no fuss will be raised. I'm sad to say that I think they're right.

------------------
ALARM! ALARM! CIVILIZATION IS IN PERIL! THE BARBARIANS HAVE TAKEN THE GATES!
 
Back
Top