azredhawk44
Moderator
This is from 3/2006, but I only heard of this last week... been looking for proof and found it.
The editorial embedded in the article is typical of the AZ Republic. Rag!:barf:
http://www.azcentral.com/blogs/inde...temen&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1&blogtype=Pluggedin
Sinema takes on the Minutemen
03/10/2006 12:20 AM
In this week's Phoenix New Times, the news column called "The Bird" goes on and on about how state Rep. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Phoenix, has introduced a great bill to crack down on the Minuteman Project and any other civilian border patrol groups.
Of course, "The Bird" stresses "that the Phoenix lefty's bill hasn't a snowball's chance in the Sonoran Desert of becoming law."
That's an unfortunate consequence of belonging to the Legislature's minority party. Majority Republicans rarely allow Democrat-sponsored bills to get very far. In the event a Republican shares or appreciates a Democrat's idea, he or she usually introduces a GOP version of the bill.
And sure enough, Sinema's House Bill 2848, which would outlaw armed border civilian patrol groups and classify them as "domestic terrorists," never even got a committee hearing.
Still, Plugged In was intrigued enough by the longshot legislation that we contacted Sinema about it.
Despite the nearly impossible odds, she writes in an e-mail that she's not giving up:
"I attempted to amend it to another bill (during floor debate Wednesday), HB 2582, but after quite a bit of lively debate and discussion, my motion failed.
"I will attempt to amend this bill to other germane bills as the session proceeds, as I believe that this issue is one of great importance. Vigilante action is very dangerous and leads to dangerous and sometimes tragic results. Our country has always opposed vigilantism, and we should continue to do so.
"In fact, the Arizona Constitution states in Article 2, Section 26 that 'The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself or the state shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain, or employ an armed body of men.'
"So this bill is in keeping with our country and state's commitment to the orderly rule of law."
We've got to agree with New Times on at least one point. In the current anti-immigrant climate at the State Capitol, Sinema's principled stand does take guts.
The editorial embedded in the article is typical of the AZ Republic. Rag!:barf:
http://www.azcentral.com/blogs/inde...temen&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1&blogtype=Pluggedin
Sinema takes on the Minutemen
03/10/2006 12:20 AM
In this week's Phoenix New Times, the news column called "The Bird" goes on and on about how state Rep. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Phoenix, has introduced a great bill to crack down on the Minuteman Project and any other civilian border patrol groups.
Of course, "The Bird" stresses "that the Phoenix lefty's bill hasn't a snowball's chance in the Sonoran Desert of becoming law."
That's an unfortunate consequence of belonging to the Legislature's minority party. Majority Republicans rarely allow Democrat-sponsored bills to get very far. In the event a Republican shares or appreciates a Democrat's idea, he or she usually introduces a GOP version of the bill.
And sure enough, Sinema's House Bill 2848, which would outlaw armed border civilian patrol groups and classify them as "domestic terrorists," never even got a committee hearing.
Still, Plugged In was intrigued enough by the longshot legislation that we contacted Sinema about it.
Despite the nearly impossible odds, she writes in an e-mail that she's not giving up:
"I attempted to amend it to another bill (during floor debate Wednesday), HB 2582, but after quite a bit of lively debate and discussion, my motion failed.
"I will attempt to amend this bill to other germane bills as the session proceeds, as I believe that this issue is one of great importance. Vigilante action is very dangerous and leads to dangerous and sometimes tragic results. Our country has always opposed vigilantism, and we should continue to do so.
"In fact, the Arizona Constitution states in Article 2, Section 26 that 'The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself or the state shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain, or employ an armed body of men.'
"So this bill is in keeping with our country and state's commitment to the orderly rule of law."
We've got to agree with New Times on at least one point. In the current anti-immigrant climate at the State Capitol, Sinema's principled stand does take guts.