Atypical CNN Report: Clinton party planted audience member speaks out

Interesting, whether it was true or not.

If it were me, I'd ask my own question anyway. See how fast she thinks on her feet.
 
CNN had the college girl who asked the question on air today. She said a Hillary aid took her aside and asked whether she wanted to ask a question. Of course, she did, but then the aid gave her a specific question to ask which wasn't what the girl actually wanted to ask. The aid told her to "just raise your hand" and you'll get picked. Hillary has said that she knew nothing about the staged questions, but what a co-incidence that out of some 400 people in the audience, only 4 were picked to ask questions, and the plant was one of them.
 
We all know every major politician does this, but CNN has released a report about Clinton, and I find it very interesting that the mostly left CNN has released such a report.

If that were true then an answer to the issue would be just that ever political campaign does that rather then the reflexive lie. In this case a VERY stupid lie that she wasn't aware of the plant despite her picking them.

She was also unaware of her several campaign contribution felony offenses. Straw donations and contributions far above the legal limits.

Seems she is far too unaware of what is going on in her own organization to be expected to take on the worlds largest organization. 'Unaware' is a mark of a very poor manager and a disqualifier for an executive.

Watch how she handles stress running for office and you will see how she handles the stress of the office. This is true of any candidate for any office. So far her default tactic has been to disappear, float deflective trail balloons, and if that fails to call in her husband. Hardly a leader, a non-executive, and far to easily knocked off balance.

If her husband wasn't Bill Clinton she would be finished. Can your spouse perform in your career because they are married to a ________(fill in blank)? NOPE. Being married to someone does nothing for your competency in that field.

I'm curious what her new 'program' will be to obscure this round of tripping on her own feet. New economic plan maybe. New foreign policy plan, something for the children maybe.
 
Candidates giving the public exactly what they want...

I'll make a connection to the "don't tase me bro", John Kerry incident in Florida.

In that discussion, notice that the majority of comments were highly critical of the student who dared to depart from the script, and ask a question that required more than 5 seconds. He had the temerity to continue speaking when the event managers decided his question was illegal. And once the thugs stepped in, the actual dialog related to his question didn't matter in the least.

Completely managed, homogenized pablum; that's what the public wants. Yeah, baby give me more!!! The exact opposite of spontaneity. Of course, the candidates are eager to please!

Make a note to watch the political conventions with a critical eye. Not a single unapproved sentence will be spoken. Except in the "free speech cage", 1/2 mile away from any cameras, and surrounded by more thugs with super-size OC sprayers, in case things should get out of hand. :barf:
 
Since links go down

From Chris Welch and David Schechter
CNN

GRINNELL, Iowa (CNN) -- The college student who was told what question to ask at one of New York Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign events said "voters have the right to know what happened" and she wasn't the only one who was planted.


Student Muriel Gallo-Chasanoff said a staffer told her what to ask at a campaign event for Sen. Hillary Clinton.

In an exclusive on-camera interview with CNN, Muriel Gallo-Chasanoff, a 19-year-old sophomore at Grinnell College in Grinnell, Iowa, said giving anyone specific questions to ask is "dishonest," and the whole incident has given her a negative outlook on politics.

Gallo-Chasanoff, whose story was first reported in the campus newspaper, said what happened was simple: She said a senior Clinton staffer asked if she'd like to ask the senator a question after an energy speech the Democratic presidential hopeful gave in Newton, Iowa, on November 6.

"I sort of thought about it, and I said 'Yeah, can I ask how her energy plan compares to the other candidates' energy plans?'" Gallo-Chasanoff said Monday night.

According to Gallo-Chasanoff, the staffer said, " 'I don't think that's a good idea, because I don't know how familiar she is with their plans.' " Watch the student speak out about question »

He then opened a binder to a page that, according to Gallo-Chasanoff, had about eight questions on it.

"The top one was planned specifically for a college student," she added. "It said 'college student' in brackets and then the question."

Don't Miss
Clinton camp: Edwards acting like Bush
Clinton pledges caution on Social Security changes
Election Center 2008
Local coverage: Scarlet & Black
Topping that sheet of paper was the following: "As a young person, I'm worried about the long-term effects of global warming. How does your plan combat climate change?" Watch the student ask the planted question »

And while she said she would have rather used her own question, Gallo-Chasanoff said she didn't have a problem asking the campaign's because she "likes to be agreeable," adding that since she told the staffer she'd ask their pre-typed question she "didn't want to go back on my word."

Clinton campaign spokesman Mo Elleithee said, "This is not acceptable campaign process moving forward. We've taken steps to ensure that it never happens again." Elleithee said Clinton had "no idea who she was calling on."

Gallo-Chasanoff wasn't so sure.

"I don't know whether Hillary knew what my question was going to be, but it seemed like she knew to call on me because there were so many people, and ... I was the only college student in that area," she said. Watch the full interview »

In a separate statement in response to the campus article, the campaign said, "On this occasion a member of our staff did discuss a possible question about Sen. Clinton's energy plan at a forum. ... This is not standard policy and will not be repeated again."

Gallo-Chasanoff said she wasn't the only person given a question.

"After the event," she said, "I heard another man ... talking about the question he asked, and he said that the campaign had asked him to ask that question."

The man she referenced prefaced his question by saying that it probably didn't have anything to do with energy, and then posed the following: "I wonder what you propose to do to create jobs for the middle-class person, such as here in Newton where we lost Maytag."

A Maytag factory in Newton recently closed, forcing hundreds of people out of their jobs.

During the course of the late-night interview on Grinnell's campus, Gallo-Chasanoff also said that the day before the school's newspaper, Scarlet and Black, printed the story, she wanted the reporter to inform the campaign out of courtesy to let them know it would be published.

She said the "head of publicity for the campaign," a man whose name she could not recall, had no factual disputes with the story. But, she added, a Clinton intern spoke to her to say the campaign requested she not talk about the story to any more media outlets and that if she did she should inform a staffer.

"I'm not under any real obligation to do that, and I haven't talked to [the campaign] anymore," Gallo-Chasanoff said, adding that she doesn't plan to.

"If what I do is come and just be totally truthful, then that's all anyone can ask of me, and that's all I can ask of myself. So I'll feel good with what I've done. I'll feel like I've done the right thing."

The Clinton campaign's acknowledgment that it planted a question reinforces a widely held criticism of the senator -- that she is not entirely honest, said Bill Schneider, CNN's senior political analyst.

"It's the same criticism often made of her husband," Schneider said. "Most Americans never felt Bill Clinton was honest and trustworthy, even when he got elected in 1992 -- with only 43 percent of the vote. His critics called him 'Slick Willy.' ... Will her critics start referring to the New York senator as 'Slick Hillary?' "

Asked if this experience makes her less likely to support Clinton's presidential bid, Gallo-Chasanoff, an undecided voter, said, "I think she has a lot to offer, but I -- this experience makes me look at her campaign a little bit differently."

"The question and answer sessions -- especially in Iowa -- are really important. That's where the voters get to ... have like a real genuine conversation with this politician who could be representing them."

While she acknowledged "it's possible that all campaigns do these kind of tactics," she said that doesn't make it right.

"Personally I want to know that I have someone who's honest representing me."

A second person has a story similar to Gallo-Chasanoff's. Geoffrey Mitchell of Hamilton, Illinois, on the Iowa border, said the Clinton campaign wanted him to ask a certain question at an Iowa event in April.

"He asked me if I would ask Sen. Clinton about ways she was going to confront the president on the war in Iraq, specifically war funding," said Geoffrey Mitchell, a supporter of Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois. "I told him it was not a question I felt comfortable with."

No questions were taken at the event. Elleithee said this incident was different from what happened with Gallo-Chasanoff in Newton. Elleithee said the staffer "bumped into someone he marginally knew" and during a conversation with Mitchell, "Iraq came up." Elleithee denied the campaign tried to plant him as a friendly questioner in the audience.

Mitchell said he had never met the staffer before the event.


Former presidential adviser David Gergen said the front-runner's campaign could take a hit from the incident.

"When a campaign plants a question, it's a pretty minor infraction of the rules -- like a parking ticket," Gergen said. "The problem here is it feeds a damaging perception of Hillary Clinton that she can't quite be trusted." E-mail to a friend

All About Iowa • Hillary Clinton

NukemJim
 
I really do not see anything wrong with having someone ask you a predetermined question. It allows the candidate to reveal more about themselves and also gives extra air time to issues they deem important (shows what they think the majority want or should want)
 
I really do not see anything wrong with having someone ask you a predetermined question. It allows the candidate to reveal more about themselves and also gives extra air time to issues they deem important (shows what they think the majority want or should want)

I agree to this when it comes to a pre-determined debate or press conference. But when you are supposedly having a public neighborhood discussion, the questions and answers are supposed to be impromptu. If they are predetermined, then it pretty much defeats the purpose of such an event.
 
I really do not see anything wrong with having someone ask you a predetermined question. It allows the candidate to reveal more about themselves and also gives extra air time to issues they deem important (shows what they think the majority want or should want)


Then simply it's a speech not a question/answer session.
 
"Personally I want to know that I have someone who's honest representing me."
I read this and didn’t know whether to laugh or cry, especially considering the politician to whom it refers
 
Hillary is not now, nor ever been good at spontaneous answers. On the other hand, Bill Clinton has always been comfortable with off the cuff answers. Hillary works best in a controlled environment. Sooner or later she will get caught by this weakness.

BTW, since Hillary knew to call on this planted student, there is a lack of honesty on Hillary's part, but what else is new.
 
You mean when the SHTF and the commies and zombies attack simultaneously?

Close. But what I mean is while the commies are attacking Hillary will not be able to respond until she reads her polls, but the polls will not be available due to the commies attacking. She will then have to consult Bill but he will be too busy with a trusted female aide. In the meantime, the zombies will take over and remove our brains so we are all like them. They will call this all the "Brave New Deal". Last, they will put Hillary to work making cookies for Martha Stewart. And finally Hillary will find her real purpose in life. I like happy endings.:)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top