Attack of the Giant Beavers (environmental backfire)

Oatka

New member
Off Topic, but another little-heard of environmental FUBAR -- "The picture changed dramatically . . . ".
http://www.gazettenet.com/05012000/business/24778.htm

Business booming in beavers

Monday, May 1, 2000 -- (HADLEY AP) - Ruth Callahan is one of a growing number of people who have found a new business in beavers - 300 years after the luxurious fur of beavers drew European settlers to Massachusetts.

Now the money's not in the beaver pelts but in combating the flooding and other problems the dam-building, tree-felling animals cause as they compete with humans for the lowlands.

``The beavers are busy, and we are too,'' Callahan said.

She has parlayed her weekend volunteer work with a wetlands protection group installing fencing and piping to foil the web-footed engineers into a full-time business, and is expanding into trapping and killing the critters.

Her customers include more than two dozen town highway departments and three railroads.

``We always liked beavers, and we saw this acrimonious debate and these poor people with their cellars flooded, and we thought there should be something in between,'' she said.

Although a Massachusetts beaver pelt can bring $25 and up, the fur trapping business has all but disappeared in the state that was known for breeding beavers with thick, high-quality pelts.

``The climate is ideal for beaver,'' said Susan Langlois, a biologist specializing in fur bearers for the state Division of Fisheries and Wildlife.

The picture changed dramatically after voters approved a referendum in 1996 limiting fur trappers to cage-type traps that don't kill the animal outright or snag it by a leg.

State biologists estimate Massachusetts has more than 60,000 beaver, more than double the 24,000 before the referendum, and as they continue to expand their territory, the number of complaints from homeowners and municipalities has skyrocketed.

This winter about 280 beaver - most of which had been causing problems in municipal water supplies and roads - were taken during the November-February trapping season.

The number was more than double any year since the referendum, but only a fraction of the 2,083 during the 1994-95 season.

``I got 18 this year, up from 15 last year,'' said Patrick Mustoe, the town of Burlington's water superintendent, who got his license and began trapping himself to protect the town's wells.

``We couldn't get anyone to come in and do it,'' he said. ``And, you have to be concerned about disease with drinking water.''

Pipes and fencing can ease the job of road crews, who in some towns were mucking out culverts daily as beavers blocked them, Callahan said. But the pipes and fences don't work in all situations, and sometimes the beavers have to be trapped and killed.

``People are beginning to think more about beaver control as a business,'' said Langlois.

Before a landowner can install a pipe or otherwise interfere with a beaver dam, they need a permit from state wildlife officials that the beavers are causing property damage and permission from local wetlands conservation officials. Beaver can be taken out of season only by specially licensed problem animal control workers.

Still, she said, the demand for people in the beaver business is greater than the supply as a fast-expanding beaver population has come to closer and closer contact with man. And the costs reflect that.

Piping and fencing costs from $100 to $800 and more and pipes don't eliminate beaver ponds, just keep them from rising. State licensed problem animal control agents charge anywhere from $100 to $500 a night to set traps and an additional $50 to $100 for each beaver caught.

``The estimate we got was $1,500 a beaver, and we have at least 10,'' said Deidre Donohoe, whose Andover home is surrounded on three sides by a beaver pond.

``We can see the beavers swimming in what used to be our back yard,'' she said. ``Four years ago we had a home in the woods.''

In Methuen, Joe Giarrusso, the city's conservation agent, said he spends about a third of his time and $13,000 a year installing and maintaining beaver piping and trapping the animals on public and private property as part of his city job.

This winter he caught and killed more than two dozen in the city that is one of the first to turn to government trapping.

And there are no quick or permanent solutions. More beavers move in when beavers are trapped and piping needs maintenance.

Even if state laws relaxing restrictions on the kinds of traps that can be used were to be approved - the House and Senate have approved competing bills, which face an uncertain future in a compromise committee - biologists estimate it would take years of sharply increased trapping to slow the population growth of the animals.

``They are thriving,'' Langlois said.

Every day, one of Donohoe's neighbors, unclogs a drainage pipe installed in the dam by her home to try to keep the water level in the pond from rising.

``Three years ago I would have been crying,'' Donohoe said. Now she's beyond crying. ``Now it's too late for us. Our trees have been standing in water so long they are all dead and our property values are gone.''

© 1999 Daily Hampshire Gazette
 
Sounds like a clear victory for the ecofreaks. People are losing their land and having to leave, which is exactly what they want.
 
With all the beaver dams raising water levels, soon there won't be a safe place in Massachusetts for a Kennedy to drive. :D

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>The estimate we got was $1,500 a beaver[/quote]

I'd prefer to de-beaver my property with a .223 rifle for $0.25 a pop. Oops, but that would be wrong. :rolleyes:
 
I'm surprised that they haven't passed a law requiring the beavers to get a building permit before they start building their dams. They just need to exercise more of that liberal "common sense."
 
Well the voters get what they deserve. In CA the voters last year outlawed leg traps. The vermit populations are now on a dramatic increase. Coyote populations around my area are skyrocketing. Once they over come their natural source of mice etc., house pets and small kids are next.



------------------
Richard

The debate is not about guns,
but rather who has the ultimate power to rule,
the People or Government.
RKBA!
 
Well, no one can't say that they were not warned that changing trapping/hunting laws because the changes made the people feel good would not cause more problems than were solved. We have seen the problems that have appeared after the hunting of mountain lions was stopped or the trapping of 'gators in Florida.

I sort of get a kick out of the whole thing. Some of those that voted for the leg trap bans now are having to hire people to kill beavers (and other critters) to protect what they have. Bwaaaaahaaaaaaaa.

Could it be that they will result to the Three S's of wolves for the beaver problems?
Shoot 'em
Shovel 'em
Shut up about it



------------------
Ne Conjuge Nobiscum
"If there be treachery, let there be jehad!"
 
Back
Top