Assault weapon machine gun ban

E

expeditionx

New member
First let me say, I am completely against all of the stupid laws that are there to infringe our second amendment rights.

I think that since all these anti-gun people are playing dirty and severely dishonest.

Its time for lawmakers that wish to uphold the second amendment to turn the game on them.

One thing I was kicking around as an idea that might serve as a way to end all the assult weapon ban sunset hysteria that the anti-gun people are raving about is to beat them to the punch.

Create a bill that settles there complaint and screws them over royally.

2004 Assult machine gun ban. Only to be applied to Fully Automatic Weapons and cant apply to semi-automatic or large capacity magzines.

Yes, I do realize that fully automatic weapons are all ready restricted.
But, this bill would include the evil features so as to destroy the feinstien and associates plan. How is Feinstein going to explain to supporters of the original clinton ban that the new bill presented by republicans isnt as good as hers ? Let her try and explain the hers covers semi -auto? Woops, you mean it never was a machine gun ban. Shed be screwed.

And the bill would allow anybody that all ready can attain fully auto to attain fully auto with all the evil features too. So nothing is lost, and the stupid scare tactics of the liberals about the sunset of the current ban will be no longer valid.

Just an idea to turn the tables. :)
 
Actually that's a brilliant idea :)

Make the FA restrictions LESS than the 1934 NFA while at the same time promoting it as a Great Step Forward in controlling those evil assault weapons.
 
Machine Gun Bann?

One of the guns banned by The Assault Weapons Ban were fully Automatic Weapons.
Those were suppose to have been regulated in 1934.
The Gun Grabber [HCI and others] tell us that if it looks mean, if it looks like an assault weapon then it is fully auto. and must be banned.

Heck, if we are going to ban guns, lets take them away from both the police and military. Sling Shots worked well for "David.
 
My idea of such an effort isnt really to ban, but to cause a pre-emtive strike against the liberals currently running with their heads cut off yelling fire in the proverbial theater. Their movement seems to be generating some momentum and could result in a nastier ban than is already there.
Don't you wish all of them would just spontaneosly combust like some of those
bizare occurances you see on a few documentaries about people just bursting into flames. :D Things to wish for. :)
 
Wouldn't it be better to play sneaky compromise with the antis? Give them a permanent semi-auto AWB minus magazine restrictions in exchange for repealing any single amendment from the 1986 FOPA.

Then strike the 1986 machinegun ban and everyone can buy brand new full autos dirt cheap and put 4" barrels on with bayonet lugs, folding stocks, grenade launchers, and whatever. :D
 
How does that work? By repealing any single amendment from the 1986 FOPA. How can the 1986 machinegun ban be made void. I love your idea
just wonder how it can be done literally.

Please spell out the mechanics of the repealing causing a void of the 1986ban. :D
 
Wasn't lautenberg the one that proposed an amendment to the FOPA to try to poison pill the whole bill? It banned registration of transferable machineguns after 1986. If the amendment is removed then regular people can register MGs on Form 1s and manufacturers can sell new products to the public again.
 
Make the FA restrictions LESS than the 1934 NFA while at the same time promoting it as a Great Step Forward in controlling those evil assault weapons
Click to expand...

*IF* that's all it does, then it's a good idea, to steal their thunder. But no, nada, zilch, BANS of any kind, way, shape, or form are constitutional under the 2A, full auto or otherwise.

In truth, what might be a good idea to help people in commie states that have no class III is to introduce a federal bill that purports to more strictly control "those evil guns" under the 34 act scheme, when what it really does is sneakily add a "supremacy clause" - stating that Congress intends to fully occupy the regulation in this area, which constitutional immediately voids all state law on the same subject, without actually changing the meat and potatoes requirements for class III - in fact actually reduces the fees and "streamlines" the paperwork (streamlining is always a good idea, right?). The law will makes Class III "stricter" and thus better for the new homeland security environment by adding the question "Are you a terrorist planning to use this gun/suppressor for illegal purposes?" on the application.

Boofuses idea is good too! Bottom line - go on the offensive and use deceit, the same preferred tactic as the gun-banners. Leave the details to the congressional staffers and the NRA/GOA lobbyists who look out for us and wine and dine the staffers.

Really, it just flat out steams me that DiFi is still the one leading the charge when she has (or did have) a CCW permit, obtained by her as the elitist that she is, since ordinary peasants can't get one in CA.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top